Government - small authorities • 2022 • past ranking

Národní technické muzeum

IČO 00023299

SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_FALSE_2 Applicants are discouraged by frequent competition modifications and cancellations.

Show average values  
18%
Bidder participation
95%
Winner concentration
26%
Pro-competitive tools
68%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
65%
Competitive contracting
21%
Consistent conduct
95%
Journal data quality
82%
Buyer profile data quality
20%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

18%
average 40%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Výběr dodavatele stavebních prací - Depozitární hala CD04
Construction work
22
Ø4 in industry
Výběr dodavatele stavebních prací
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry
„Zajištění bezpečnostních služeb a pultu centralizované ochrany pro objekty Národního technického muzea oblast Praha“
Security services
3
Ø4 in industry
Nákup pozemků a příslušenství
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
„Zajištění bezpečnostních služeb a pultu centralizované ochrany pro objekty Národního technického muzea Čelákovice, Chomutov a Plasy“
Security services
3
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 88%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
IMOS Brno, a.s.
 1 94,479,665
České dráhy, a.s.
 10 54,323,375
Agentura PANCÉŘ s.r.o.
 1 44,658,318
INDUS PRAHA, spol. s r.o.
 1 27,184,273
DCI Czech a.s.
 1 26,782,000
Other suppliers 848 127,999,814

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

26%
average 31%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 15% (2 from 13)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 19)
Division into lots 11% (2 from 19)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 19)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 19)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 113,334,169
Small scale tenders 120,826,333
Unregulated purchases 265,714,157
Total 499,874,659

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

65%
average 85%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
„Nákup 65 kusů historických kolejových vozidel a 2 kusů podvalníků“
Technical exclusivity 		- 21,935,397
JŘBÚ „Dodávka vzpřímeného mikroskopu s LIBS modulem a příslušenstvím
Technical exclusivity 		- 3,305,786

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

95%
average 95%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 5% (1 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 14% (3 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

82%
average 70%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 90% (zakázek z 20 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.50 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 20 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 798 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 39 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 18 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 11 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

20%
average 75%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.