Government - small authorities • 2022 • past ranking

Ústřední kontrolní a zkušební ústav zemědělský

IČO 00020338

Good buyer. SUPPLIER_FEEDBACK_FALSE_1 Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

3.
ranking
79%
Zindex
Show average values  
54%
Bidder participation
95%
Winner concentration
60%
Pro-competitive tools
48%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
81%
Competitive contracting
85%
Consistent conduct
98%
Journal data quality
89%
Buyer profile data quality
40%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 40%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Dodávka LC-MS/MS
Chromatographs
1
Ø1 in industry
Dodávka chromatografu LC-MS/MS
Chromatographs
1
Ø1 in industry
Dodávka iontového chromatografu s vodivostním a tandemovým hmotnostně selektivním detektorem typu trojitého kvadrupólu (IC-MS/MS) a kapalinového chromatografu s DAD a FL detektorem (HPLC) - Část 1 - Dodávka iontového chromatografu
Chromatographs
1
Ø1 in industry
Hmotnostní spektrometr s indukčně vázaným plazmatem a kapalinovým chromatografem ICP/MS-HPLC
Mass spectrometer
1
Ø1 in industry
Dodávka maloparcelní sklízecí mlátičky obilovin
Agricultural machinery
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 88%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
AMEDIS, spol. s r.o.
 2 13,209,980
HPST, s.r.o.
 5 11,998,517
WATERS Gesellschaft m.b.H., organizační složka
 2 11,490,698
FORCORP GROUP spol. s r.o.
 6 9,111,192
Velkoobchod ŠAS,s.r.o.
 263 6,204,811
Other suppliers 288 142,308,604

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

60%
average 31%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 25% (5 from 20)
Nonprice competition 40% (10 from 25)
Division into lots 28% (7 from 25)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 25)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 25)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

48%
average 59%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 95,996,308
Small scale tenders 159,180,795
Unregulated purchases 837,514,011
Total 1,092,691,113

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

81%
average 85%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
UPGRADE LABORATORNÍHO SYSTÉMU LABSYSTÉM Z VERZE 6 NA VERZI 7 - 2019
Technical exclusivity 		- 3,845,000
Služby VPN pro ÚKZÚZ 2018-2020
Contract modification 		1,955,040 586,512 (+30%)
Zajištění úklidových služeb 2020 - 2023
Contract modification 		6,912,779 167,757 (+3%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

85%
average 68%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.05
Average decision length 36.42 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 95%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 26)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 26)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 26)
Missing call for tenders 4% (1 from 26)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 26)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 26)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

89%
average 70%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (zakázek z 21 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.67 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 56 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 46 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 42 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 33 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

40%
average 75%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.