Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Šlapanice

IČO 00282651

Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Enough firms are competing for contracts.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

70%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilony F a G
Construction work
9
Ø4 in industry
Odstranění staré ekologické zátěže v bývalém areálu ICEC-Šlapanice
Refuse and waste related services
4
Ø1 in industry
„Dům v parku Riegrova“
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilon C (kuchyň)
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice - pavilon C (kuchyň)
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
DEKONTA, a.s.
2 139,854,992
Metrostav a.s.
1 131,855,980
3V & H, s.r.o.
1 39,999,999
IDPS s.r.o.
1 24,724,777
PŘEMYSL VESELÝ stavební a inženýrská činnost s.r.o.
1 13,795,115
Other suppliers 23 344,399,207

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

70%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 441,153,778
Small scale tenders 54,075,973
Unregulated purchases 505,131,938
Total 1,000,361,689

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

84%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Odstranění staré ekologické zátěže v bývalém areálu ICEC-Šlapanice
Contract modification
130,888,522 16,917,386 (+13%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

56%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 11%
Average requirements modifications count 2.11
Average decision length 75.22 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 7% (1 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

46%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.21 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 10 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.