Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Enough firms are competing for contracts.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilony F a G
Construction work |
9
Ø4 in industry |
|
Odstranění staré ekologické zátěže v bývalém areálu ICEC-Šlapanice
Refuse and waste related services |
4
Ø1 in industry |
|
„Dům v parku Riegrova“
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilon C (kuchyň)
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice - pavilon C (kuchyň)
Construction work |
0
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
DEKONTA, a.s. |
2 | 139,854,992 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 131,855,980 |
|
3V & H, s.r.o. |
1 | 39,999,999 |
|
IDPS s.r.o. |
1 | 24,724,777 |
|
PŘEMYSL VESELÝ stavební a inženýrská činnost s.r.o. |
1 | 13,795,115 |
| Other suppliers | 23 | 344,399,207 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
DEKONTA, a.s. |
2 | 139,854,992 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
1 | 131,855,980 |
|
3V & H, s.r.o. |
1 | 39,999,999 |
|
IDPS s.r.o. |
1 | 24,724,777 |
|
PŘEMYSL VESELÝ stavební a inženýrská činnost s.r.o. |
1 | 13,795,115 |
|
VS-build, s.r.o. |
1 | 9,468,499 |
|
Potrusil s.r.o. |
1 | 7,318,051 |
|
TOKA s.r.o. |
2 | 6,546,715 |
|
Skanska a.s. |
1 | 5,359,682 |
|
ELEKTRO PLUS, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 4,484,158 |
|
Kaiser servis, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 4,000,000 |
|
C SYSTEM CZ a.s. |
3 | 3,031,600 |
|
KONE, a.s. |
1 | 2,842,000 |
|
VWR International s.r.o. |
1 | 2,451,602 |
|
gogolák + grasse s.r.o. |
1 | 1,920,000 |
|
Ing. Karel Bartušek |
1 | 1,877,013 |
|
LUMÍR ZEZULKA - ZEKA |
1 | 1,640,000 |
|
PKV BUILD s.r.o. |
1 | 1,472,500 |
|
Pražská energetika, a.s. |
1 | 1,440,044 |
|
EPS biotechnology, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,429,320 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
1 | 1,367,982 |
|
ČTYŘSTĚN s.r.o. |
1 | 1,046,000 |
|
MDP GEO, s.r.o. |
1 | 998,000 |
|
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 971,608 |
|
SafeThing s.r.o. |
1 | 139,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 8) |
| Nonprice competition | 20% (3 from 15) |
| Division into lots | 13% (2 from 15) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Innovative procedure | 7% (1 from 15) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 441,153,778 |
| Small scale tenders | 54,075,973 |
| Unregulated purchases | 505,131,938 |
| Total | 1,000,361,689 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 652,855,417 |
| Material consumption | 16,656,160 |
| Energy consumption | 15,344,596 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 39,007 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 6,823 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 57,606,030 |
| Travel costs | 1,714,497 |
| Representation costs | 1,503,804 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 225,586,919 |
| Small long-term property costs | 26,974,924 |
| Other costs | 2,073,511 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Odstranění staré ekologické zátěže v bývalém areálu ICEC-Šlapanice Contract modification |
130,888,522 | 16,917,386 (+13%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Odstranění staré ekologické zátěže v bývalém areálu ICEC-Šlapanice Contract modification |
130,888,522 | 16,917,386 (+13%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 11% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 2.11 |
| Average decision length | 75.22 days |
| Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Strategické dokumenty pro město Šlapanice – nové vyhlášení | 0 | 77 | ||
| Dodávka interiérového vybavení učebního pavilonu F | 0 | 40 | ||
| Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilony F a G | 7 | 37 | ||
| Modernizace odborných učeben ZŠ Šlapanice | 0 | 59 | ||
| Dodávka interiérového vybavení - Dům v parku | 1 | 49 | ||
| „Dům v parku Riegrova“ | 8 | 88 | ||
| Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice - pavilon C (kuchyň) | 3 | 7 | ||
| Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilon C (kuchyň) | 0 | 65 | ||
| Cukrovar - nové centrum Šlapanic | 0 | 255 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 7% (1 from 15) |
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilony F a G | Contract modification by more than 50 % |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.21 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
