Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Šlapanice

IČO 00282651

Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Enough firms are competing for contracts.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilony F a G
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Odstranění staré ekologické zátěže v bývalém areálu ICEC-Šlapanice
Refuse and waste related services
Ø1 in industry
„Dům v parku Riegrova“
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilon C (kuchyň)
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice - pavilon C (kuchyň)
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
2 139,854,992
Metrostav a.s.
1 131,855,980
3V & H, s.r.o.
1 39,999,999
IDPS s.r.o.
1 24,724,777
PŘEMYSL VESELÝ stavební a inženýrská činnost s.r.o.
1 13,795,115
Other suppliers 23 344,399,207

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 441,153,778
Small scale tenders 54,075,973
Unregulated purchases 505,131,938
Total 1,000,361,689

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Odstranění staré ekologické zátěže v bývalém areálu ICEC-Šlapanice
Contract modification
130,888,522 16,917,386 (+13%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 11%
Average requirements modifications count 2.11
Average decision length 75.22 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 7% (1 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.21 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 10 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.