Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Šlapanice

IČO 00282651

Good buyer. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

8.
ranking
77%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

64%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilony F a G
Construction work
9
Ø4 in industry
Odstranění staré ekologické zátěže v bývalém areálu ICEC - Šlapanice
Refuse and waste related services
4
Ø2 in industry
„Dům v parku Riegrova“
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice – pavilon C (kuchyň)
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Rozšíření kapacit zázemí ZŠ Šlapanice - pavilon C (kuchyň)
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav a.s.
1 131,855,980
DEKONTA, a.s.
1 130,888,522
3V & H, s.r.o.
1 39,999,999
IDPS s.r.o.
1 24,724,777
STRABAG a.s.
3 17,562,014
Other suppliers 73 127,160,605

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 10)
Nonprice competition 28% (7 from 25)
Division into lots 32% (8 from 25)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 25)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 25)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

87%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 370,630,374
Small scale tenders 64,039,180
Unregulated purchases 140,722,487
Total 575,392,041

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Projekční služby pro město Šlapanice
Contract modification
1,657,000 224,000 (+14%)
Prpojekční služby - areál ZŠ Šlapanice
Contract modification
666,667 50,000 (+8%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

92%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 4% (1 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 27)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 27)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 4% (1 from 27)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

52%
average 43%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (zakázek z 27 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 27 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 6 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 3 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 9 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 13 zakázek