Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Rychvald

IČO 00297615

Buyer profile has high number of errors. The competition for contracts is high.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STASPO, spol. s r.o.
1 9,847,450
2 9,182,898
VDS, spol. s r.o.
2 9,112,103
1 7,117,117
GORDIC spol. s r.o.
1 4,897,969
Other suppliers 2 12,015,086

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 78,926,394
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 280,682,365
Total 359,608,760

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce části budovy č.p. 1609 – vytvoření zázemí pro Dům dětí a mládeže Rychvald II
Contract modification
9,112,103 2,318,101 (+26%)
Komunikace pro pěší podél ul. Michálkovické v Rychvaldě – úsek 2 a 3
Contract modification
6,207,909 1,546,344 (+25%)
Komunikace pro pěší podél ul. Michálkovické v Rychvaldě – úsek 1
Contract modification
2,974,988 778,046 (+27%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 57% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.43 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.