Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Ivančice

IČO 00281859

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Oprava účelových a místních komunikací, Ivančice – Řeznovice a Hrubšice
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
„Oprava dešťové kanalizace v místní části Řeznovice a Hrubšice“
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Přestupní terminál Ivančice, etapa 1 - Park & Ride II.
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
„Oprava dešťové kanalizace v místní části Budkovice“
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Oprava místních komunikací, Ivančice - Budkovice
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
COLAS CZ, a.s.
4 59,064,345
Společnost Budkovice – dešťovka, zast. IDPS s.r.o.
4 59,064,345
1 31,783,000
PROFI KLIMA solution s.r.o.
1 8,701,902
TROJAN - ZTI, s.r.o.
3 7,205,132
Other suppliers 26 131,814,477

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 228,143,980
Small scale tenders 136,146,609
Unregulated purchases 243,033,753
Total 607,324,342

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
„Výměna vzduchotechnického zařízení ve Školní jídelně Ivančice-opakovaná”
Contract modification
8,701,902 101,657 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 0.40
Average decision length 54.00 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 9)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 9)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 9)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 9)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 9)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 9)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 78% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.33 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 10 tenders
1000K+ 12 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.