Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Oprava účelových a místních komunikací, Ivančice – Řeznovice a Hrubšice
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
„Oprava dešťové kanalizace v místní části Řeznovice a Hrubšice“
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Přestupní terminál Ivančice, etapa 1 - Park & Ride II.
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
„Oprava dešťové kanalizace v místní části Budkovice“
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Oprava místních komunikací, Ivančice - Budkovice
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
4 | 59,064,345 |
|
Společnost Budkovice – dešťovka, zast. IDPS s.r.o. |
4 | 59,064,345 |
|
PREFA KOMPOZITY, a.s. |
1 | 31,783,000 |
|
PROFI KLIMA solution s.r.o. |
1 | 8,701,902 |
|
TROJAN - ZTI, s.r.o. |
3 | 7,205,132 |
| Other suppliers | 26 | 131,814,477 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
COLAS CZ, a.s. |
4 | 59,064,345 |
|
Společnost Budkovice – dešťovka, zast. IDPS s.r.o. |
4 | 59,064,345 |
|
PREFA KOMPOZITY, a.s. |
1 | 31,783,000 |
|
PROFI KLIMA solution s.r.o. |
1 | 8,701,902 |
|
TROJAN - ZTI, s.r.o. |
3 | 7,205,132 |
|
EMPEMONT s.r.o. |
1 | 5,826,114 |
|
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o. |
1 | 4,420,622 |
|
SEADON s.r.o. |
1 | 2,691,255 |
|
IBAU CZ s.r.o. |
2 | 2,102,549 |
|
Technické služby CZ s.r.o. |
2 | 2,074,552 |
|
Ekostavby Brno, a.s. |
1 | 1,930,625 |
|
DS DUMA s.r.o. |
1 | 1,906,749 |
|
Ordos s.r.o. |
1 | 1,897,861 |
|
3D PROGRAM, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,660,165 |
|
IVACAR 2000, a.s. |
1 | 900,244 |
|
MUKOV, s.r.o. |
1 | 742,566 |
|
TABERNÁKL, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 709,281 |
|
Jaroslav Fiala |
1 | 598,500 |
|
QIM Atelier s.r.o. |
1 | 595,000 |
|
Kašpárek Luboš, Ing. |
1 | 570,000 |
|
APC SILNICE s.r.o. |
1 | 560,000 |
|
ZMES, s. r. o. |
1 | 552,025 |
|
PROSTR trading, s.r.o. |
1 | 409,000 |
|
Parking Pro s.r.o. |
1 | 12,192 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 3) |
| Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 9) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 9) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 228,143,980 |
| Small scale tenders | 136,146,609 |
| Unregulated purchases | 243,033,753 |
| Total | 607,324,342 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 312,913,547 |
| Material consumption | 18,892,431 |
| Energy consumption | 21,753,711 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 487,881 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 138,544,662 |
| Travel costs | 789,800 |
| Representation costs | 1,407,321 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 92,643,433 |
| Small long-term property costs | 14,190,356 |
| Other costs | 5,701,200 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
„Výměna vzduchotechnického zařízení ve Školní jídelně Ivančice-opakovaná” Contract modification |
8,701,902 | 101,657 (+2%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
„Výměna vzduchotechnického zařízení ve Školní jídelně Ivančice-opakovaná” Contract modification |
8,701,902 | 101,657 (+2%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 0% |
| Cancelled contracts | 20% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.40 |
| Average decision length | 54.00 days |
| Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| „Výměna vzduchotechnického zařízení ve Školní jídelně Ivančice-opakovaná” | 0 | 45 | ||
| Protipovodňová opatření města Ivančice | 2 | 37 | ||
| Oprava místních komunikací, Ivančice - Budkovice | 0 | 89 | ||
| „Výměna vzduchotechnického zařízení ve Školní jídelně Ivančice” | 0 | 10 | ||
| Oprava účelových a místních komunikací, Ivančice – Řeznovice a Hrubšice | 0 | 89 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 9) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 78% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.33 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Protipovodňová opatření města Ivančice | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| „Výměna vzduchotechnického zařízení ve Školní jídelně Ivančice” | Tender not found on any profile |
| Přestupní terminál Ivančice, etapa 1 - Park & Ride | Tender not found on any profile |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
