Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Ivančice

IČO 00281859

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

15%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Oprava účelových a místních komunikací, Ivančice – Řeznovice a Hrubšice
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
„Oprava dešťové kanalizace v místní části Řeznovice a Hrubšice“
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce Besedního domu v Ivančicích
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce Besedního domu v Ivančicích
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
1
Ø2 in industry
"Rekonstrukce Besedního domu v Ivančicích"
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

53%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
OSP, spol. s r.o.
4 99,218,469
COLAS CZ, a.s.
4 59,064,345
Společnost Budkovice – dešťovka, zast. IDPS s.r.o.
4 59,064,345
1. VASTO spol. s r.o.
1 5,972,250
EMPEMONT s.r.o.
1 5,826,114
Other suppliers 50 68,897,367

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 126,219,716
Small scale tenders 128,326,425
Unregulated purchases 296,525,766
Total 551,071,907

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce Besedního domu v Ivančicích
Contract modification
28,348,396 4,072,480 (+15%)
"Stavební úpravy objektu v Budkovicích - I. etapa" - dodatek č. 2
Contract modification
5,972,250 2,607,351 (+44%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

62%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.67
Average decision length 110.00 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

51%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 73% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 23 tenders
1000K+ 27 tenders