Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Veselí nad Lužnicí

IČO 00253081

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Celková rekonstrukce vnitřních rozvodů MŠ U Zastávky
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
„Rekonstrukce vnitřních rozvodů ZŠ Čs. armády“
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Přestupní terminál Veselí nad Lužnicí
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Celková rekonstrukce vnitřních rozvodů MŠ Blatské sídliště
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy sociálních bytů ve Veselí nad Lužnicí II
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Spilka a Říha s.r.o.
3 69,981,278
2 30,174,533
Bautechnik s.r.o.
1 15,423,948
PL BEKO s.r.o.
2 14,558,571
1 9,289,777
Other suppliers 9 119,052,915

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 253,007,371
Small scale tenders 7,947,792
Unregulated purchases 432,457,377
Total 693,412,540

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Cyklostezka Horusice_Veselí nad Lužnicí
Contract modification
8,397,119 670,539 (+8%)
Přestupní terminál Veselí nad Lužnicí
Contract modification
21,777,414 348,624 (+2%)
Stavební úpravy sociálních bytů ve Veselí nad Lužnicí II
Contract modification
15,423,948 270,175 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 27% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.13 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.