Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Veselí nad Lužnicí

IČO 00253081

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

54%
average 47%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Celková rekonstrukce vnitřních rozvodů MŠ U Zastávky
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
„Rekonstrukce vnitřních rozvodů ZŠ Čs. armády“
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Mateřská škola Horusice
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
ZTV POD VODOJEMEM
Construction work
9
Ø4 in industry
Přestupní terminál Veselí nad Lužnicí
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

66%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Spilka a Říha s.r.o.
3 76,974,374
STRABAG a.s.
4 34,835,808
COLAS CZ, a.s.
1 21,965,929
Jindřichohradecká stavební s.r.o.
1 17,084,630
Bautechnik s.r.o.
1 15,423,948
Other suppliers 13 59,918,601

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

39%
average 32%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

63%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 214,239,535
Small scale tenders 9,086,592
Unregulated purchases 344,183,832
Total 567,509,959

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
VESELÍ NAD LUŽNICÍ – HORUSICE, ČOV A KANALIZACE – 1. ETAPA
Contract modification
16,525,750 2,057,672 (+13%)
Přestupní terminál Veselí nad Lužnicí
Contract modification
21,777,414 161,491 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 6% (1 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

20%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.69 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 2 tenders