Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Zajištění městské hromadné dopravy v Rychnově nad Kněžnou na období 2021- 2029
Public road transport services |
3
Ø3 in industry |
|
Bytový dům Mírová (nad Billou)
Building construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
Bytový dům Mírová Rychnov nad Kněžnou
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Výběr poskytovatele služby - pojištění Město Rychnov nad Kněžnou
Insurance services |
5
Ø2 in industry |
|
Výstavba vodovodu, kanalizace a veřejného osvětlení v ulici Na Sádkách, Rychnov nad Kněžnou
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
2
Ø2 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
STATING s.r.o. |
2 | 83,357,335 |
|
AUDIS BUS s.r.o. |
1 | 46,616,000 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
2 | 27,400,269 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
1 | 11,125,850 |
|
Stavitelství EU s.r.o. |
4 | 7,246,276 |
| Other suppliers | 59 | 247,544,748 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
STATING s.r.o. |
2 | 83,357,335 |
|
AUDIS BUS s.r.o. |
1 | 46,616,000 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
2 | 27,400,269 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
1 | 11,125,850 |
|
Stavitelství EU s.r.o. |
4 | 7,246,276 |
|
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o. |
3 | 6,765,605 |
|
KONKRET CZ, spol. s r. o. |
6 | 6,502,781 |
|
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group |
1 | 6,026,995 |
|
V A K S T A V spol. s r. o. Jablonné n. Orlicí |
1 | 5,753,172 |
|
MATEX HK s.r.o. |
3 | 5,068,242 |
|
Veolia Komodity ČR, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,011,200 |
|
R E M I N G , s. r. o. |
2 | 4,710,000 |
|
Stanislav Drejsl |
2 | 4,697,334 |
|
M - STAV CZ s.r.o. |
4 | 4,414,821 |
|
FORCORP GROUP spol. s r.o. |
13 | 3,690,365 |
|
CONT s.r.o. |
2 | 3,530,400 |
|
NOVOSTAV KOMUNIKACE a.s. |
3 | 3,496,913 |
|
DLNK s.r.o. |
1 | 2,977,500 |
|
P S K , s.r.o. CHOCEŇ |
1 | 2,708,748 |
|
Lesprojekt východní Čechy, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,984,500 |
|
IRBOS s.r.o. |
2 | 1,975,000 |
|
Vodafone Czech Republic a.s. |
1 | 1,760,738 |
|
MSV výtahy a.s. |
1 | 1,574,000 |
|
TEWIKO systems, s.r.o. |
1 | 966,256 |
|
FORENTA s.r.o. |
1 | 886,000 |
|
Stavrecon Pardubice s.r.o. |
1 | 882,397 |
|
W.H.A. system, spol. s r. o. |
1 | 781,088 |
|
CONCH s.r.o. |
1 | 730,736 |
|
VANIDOX s.r.o. |
1 | 546,667 |
|
ELKONA CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 435,866 |
|
Raamar, s.r.o. |
1 | 401,520 |
|
ŠTĚPÁNEK, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 180,413 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 50% (2 from 4) |
| Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 7) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 7) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 7) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 7) |
| Contract | Extended deadlines | Nonprice competition | Division into lots | E-auction | Innovative procedure |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Výběr poskytovatele služby - pojištění Město Rychnov nad Kněžnou | |||||
| Intenzifikace ČOV Rychnov nad Kněžnou | |||||
| Bytový dům Mírová (nad Billou) | |||||
| Zajištění městské hromadné dopravy v Rychnově nad Kněžnou na období 2021- 2029 | |||||
| Bytový dům Mírová Rychnov nad Kněžnou | |||||
| PD - Bytový dům Mírová (pod bazénem), Rychnov nad Kněžnou | |||||
| Modernizace technologického centra Rychnov nad Kněžnou |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 281,220,758 |
| Small scale tenders | 66,722,302 |
| Unregulated purchases | 460,015,966 |
| Total | 807,959,026 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 440,410,410 |
| Material consumption | 16,193,550 |
| Energy consumption | 24,645,580 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 0 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 133,076,638 |
| Travel costs | 834,547 |
| Representation costs | 688,625 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 171,613,290 |
| Small long-term property costs | 12,638,871 |
| Other costs | 7,857,514 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 11) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 11) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.80 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Bytový dům Mírová Rychnov nad Kněžnou | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| Výběr poskytovatele služby - pojištění Město Rychnov nad Kněžnou | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| Výběr poskytovatele služby - pojištění Město Rychnov nad Kněžnou | Payment information missing |
| PD - Bytový dům Mírová (pod bazénem), Rychnov nad Kněžnou | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| Bytový dům Mírová (nad Billou) | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| Zajištění městské hromadné dopravy v Rychnově nad Kněžnou na období 2021- 2029 | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| Dodávka elektřiny v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky elektřiny na rok 2020 a 2021 | Payment information missing |
| Modernizace technologického centra Rychnov nad Kněžnou | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
