Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Rychnov nad Kněžnou

IČO 00275336

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zajištění městské hromadné dopravy v Rychnově nad Kněžnou na období 2021- 2029
Public road transport services
3
Ø3 in industry
Bytový dům Mírová (nad Billou)
Building construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Bytový dům Mírová Rychnov nad Kněžnou
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Výběr poskytovatele služby - pojištění Město Rychnov nad Kněžnou
Insurance services
5
Ø2 in industry
Výstavba vodovodu, kanalizace a veřejného osvětlení v ulici Na Sádkách, Rychnov nad Kněžnou
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STATING s.r.o.
2 83,357,335
AUDIS BUS s.r.o.
1 46,616,000
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s.
2 27,400,269
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
1 11,125,850
Stavitelství EU s.r.o.
4 7,246,276
Other suppliers 59 247,544,748

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 50% (2 from 4)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 7)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 7)
E-auction 0% (0 from 7)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 7)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 281,220,758
Small scale tenders 66,722,302
Unregulated purchases 460,015,966
Total 807,959,026

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.80 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 10 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 15 tenders
1000K+ 25 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.