Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Rychnov nad Kněžnou

IČO 00275336

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer does not use tools to support competition.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 47%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STYLBAU, s.r.o.
1 75,473,445
STATING s.r.o.
2 42,382,608
KVIS Pardubice a.s.
1 26,091,997
MADOS MT s.r.o.
1 18,484,786
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 13,815,463
Other suppliers 14 56,597,630

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

0%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 1)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 19)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 19)
E-auction and DPS 0% (0 from 19)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 19)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

54%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 221,425,940
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 550,050,269
Total 771,476,209

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nízkokapacitní zařízení pro poskytování sociálních služeb Rychnov nad Kněžnou - nové stavební práce
Additional works
- 2,517,890

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

80%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 22)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 22)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 22)
Missing call for tenders 32% (7 from 22)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 22)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 22)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 43%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 14% (zakázek z 22 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.09 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 22 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 0 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 0 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 0 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 0 zakázek