Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Pacov

IČO 00248789

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Komunitní centrum Pacov
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy odborných učeben a bezbariérovost ZŠ Pacov, Za Branou
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy kuchyně Domu sociálních služeb v Pacově
Construction work for buildings relating to leisure, sports, culture, lodging and restaurants
Ø3 in industry
ZTV pro výstavbu rodinných a bytových domů "U Unika" v Pacově - III. etapa
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
Ø6 in industry
ZTV pro výstavbu rodinných domů, lokalita "U Unika" v Pacově - II. etapa výstavby - II. podetapa
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
HORA s.r.o.
1 32,884,684
ACG-Real s.r.o.
1 23,391,062
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
3 18,574,769
ARTRANS s.r.o.
1 18,260,433
SYNER VHS Vysočina, a.s.
1 6,145,000
Other suppliers 12 72,887,682

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 9)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 15)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 15)
E-auction 0% (0 from 15)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 15)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 326,068,867
Small scale tenders 13,394,381
Unregulated purchases 313,384,095
Total 652,847,343

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
ZTV pro výstavbu rodinných a bytových domů "U Unika" v Pacově - III. etapa
Contract modification
10,197,889 2,040,576 (+21%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.20 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 2 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.