Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce Bystřice v Teplicích
River regulation and flood control works |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Revitalizace Svitávky u Kunratických rybníků, ř. km 27,007 - 28,197
River regulation and flood control works |
9
Ø4 in industry |
|
Jez Loket dolní - rekonstrukce jezu
Construction work for water projects |
2
Ø6 in industry |
|
PB zeď Ploučnice v Březinách nad mostem (3,900-4,515)
River regulation and flood control works |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
„HC Nechranice – generální oprava TG 1 a TG 2“ „HC Nechranice – rozvodna 22 kV a 6 kV“ „HC Nechranice – dispečerské řízení“
Construction work for water projects |
3
Ø6 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
NOWASTAV akciová společnost |
10 | 164,898,840 |
|
RRR spol. s r.o. |
12 | 142,061,309 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
2 | 114,105,574 |
|
TRANS-REGION-STAV s.r.o. |
12 | 70,134,831 |
|
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 67,470,216 |
| Other suppliers | 238 | 665,508,495 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
NOWASTAV akciová společnost |
10 | 164,898,840 |
|
RRR spol. s r.o. |
12 | 142,061,309 |
|
Metrostav a.s. |
2 | 114,105,574 |
|
TRANS-REGION-STAV s.r.o. |
12 | 70,134,831 |
|
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným |
1 | 67,470,216 |
|
Bulharská hydrostavební společnost s.r.o. |
1 | 67,470,216 |
|
Bauvant s.r.o. |
14 | 60,817,350 |
|
ČKD Blansko Engineering, a.s. |
1 | 58,384,077 |
|
DREDGER s.r.o. |
4 | 55,267,336 |
|
Potápěčská stanice, a.s. |
7 | 39,640,821 |
|
Vodohospodářská stavební spol. s r. o. |
7 | 32,859,587 |
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
1 | 32,450,400 |
|
VODNÍ DÍLA - TBD a.s. |
3 | 23,104,710 |
|
PATOK a.s. |
2 | 22,728,116 |
|
HBAPS, s.r.o. |
2 | 15,495,822 |
|
Ekostavby Brno, a.s. |
1 | 14,859,474 |
|
Sweco Hydroprojekt a.s. |
6 | 12,506,342 |
|
Gerhard Horejsek a spol., s.r.o. |
4 | 11,209,218 |
|
Vodohospodářský rozvoj a výstavba a.s. |
7 | 11,174,088 |
|
AZ SANACE a.s. - účastník sdružení |
1 | 9,988,750 |
|
JETCON spol. s r.o. |
1 | 8,909,241 |
|
Chromservis s.r.o. |
1 | 8,496,000 |
|
FREYSSINET CS, a.s. |
1 | 7,696,712 |
|
AFC Servis DC a.s. |
2 | 7,562,162 |
|
SAMSON PRAHA, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 7,498,620 |
|
SUEZ Využití zdrojů a.s. |
1 | 6,457,878 |
|
Scania Czech Republic s.r.o. |
2 | 6,033,400 |
|
Ing. Eduard Sýkora - ESAKO |
1 | 5,603,469 |
|
STABIA s.r.o. |
3 | 5,557,664 |
|
AUTO IN s.r.o. |
3 | 5,200,134 |
|
aSERVIS spol. s r. o. |
1 | 4,994,837 |
|
HYDROSOFT Veleslavín s.r.o. |
1 | 4,907,988 |
|
KlaGeo, s.r.o. |
2 | 4,732,192 |
|
TEBA MONTÁŽE s.r.o. |
2 | 4,671,966 |
|
Pöyry Environment a.s. |
1 | 4,386,000 |
|
AVE-servis, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 4,258,251 |
|
HOCHTIEF CZ a. s. |
1 | 3,928,116 |
|
HG partner s.r.o. |
7 | 3,927,000 |
|
EXMONT-Energo a.s. |
1 | 3,790,000 |
|
ODT Management s.r.o |
1 | 3,656,267 |
|
PORR a.s. |
1 | 3,560,840 |
|
ŠU-STR s.r.o. |
1 | 3,497,477 |
|
Strojírny Brno, a.s. |
1 | 3,396,000 |
|
Výzkumný ústav vodohospodářský T. G. Masaryka veřejná výzkumná instituce |
3 | 3,204,500 |
|
EKOSTAVBY Louny s.r.o. |
1 | 2,895,000 |
|
CARBON Instruments, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,853,500 |
|
EKONORD s.r.o. |
1 | 2,841,325 |
|
TopKarMoto s.r.o. |
1 | 2,830,000 |
|
Y-CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 2,770,000 |
|
Ševčík HYDRO s.r.o. |
1 | 2,728,900 |
|
ART DESIGN s.r.o. |
2 | 2,719,867 |
|
Building & Law, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,674,933 |
|
O2 Czech Republic a.s. |
2 | 2,650,000 |
|
STRATOS AUTO, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,491,000 |
|
"VP PROJEKTING" s.r.o. |
3 | 2,448,000 |
|
ŘEHÁK, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,440,333 |
|
World Invest |
1 | 2,415,938 |
|
YSSEN - spol. s r.o. |
1 | 2,378,999 |
|
STROJSERVIS Praha, s.r.o |
1 | 2,348,000 |
|
AGROZET České Budějovice, a.s. |
1 | 2,160,000 |
|
Carl Stahl & spol, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,955,135 |
|
Radek Kubač |
2 | 1,665,065 |
|
A G R O M E T A L L s. r. o. |
1 | 1,524,354 |
|
SaM silnice a mosty a.s. |
1 | 1,489,995 |
|
Valbek, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,439,000 |
|
NOPESTAV s.r.o. |
2 | 1,401,645 |
|
KAISER DATA s.r.o. |
1 | 1,292,270 |
|
ATUT-TUTY s.r.o. |
3 | 1,164,373 |
|
SKYCLEAN s.r.o. |
5 | 1,134,400 |
|
Auto SAS s.r.o. |
1 | 1,098,500 |
|
ARBO, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 945,000 |
|
ALFA PROFI s.r.o. |
1 | 919,000 |
|
Ervín Tuháček |
1 | 879,450 |
|
Auto Kora top s.r.o. |
1 | 828,980 |
|
Šilhánek a syn, a.s. |
1 | 797,980 |
|
ONERO s.r.o. |
1 | 768,489 |
|
V&J Stavební, a.s. |
1 | 757,620 |
|
Radek Scheerbaum |
1 | 753,000 |
|
Auto Trutnov s.r.o. |
1 | 708,560 |
|
M 3000, a.s. |
1 | 702,206 |
|
EKOTOXA s.r.o. |
1 | 695,000 |
|
ŠINDLAR s. r. o. |
1 | 667,000 |
|
DOPRAVNÍ STAVBY KOLÍN, a.s. |
1 | 628,893 |
|
AQUATEST a.s. |
1 | 590,000 |
|
Ing. Jan Procházka |
1 | 579,968 |
|
Altec spol. s r. o. |
1 | 576,191 |
|
GRV Engineering s.r.o. |
26 | 560,826 |
|
GEODÉZIE - TOPOS a.s. |
26 | 560,826 |
|
M.T. PLUS s.r.o. |
1 | 549,550 |
|
SHIMADZU Handels GmbH-organizační složka |
1 | 527,819 |
|
ENVISYSTEM, s. r. o. |
1 | 516,000 |
|
TELE DATA CONTROL, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 501,755 |
|
Ing. Mgr. Hana Vanclová |
17 | 424,461 |
|
kratkyaudit s.r.o. |
1 | 240,000 |
|
GEFOS a.s. |
9 | 136,365 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 8% (5 from 63) |
| Nonprice competition | 13% (12 from 95) |
| Division into lots | 4% (4 from 95) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 95) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 95) |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
PB zeď Ploučnice v Březinách nad mostem (3,900-4,515) Contract modification |
61,500,000 | 10,889,367 (+18%) |
|
Bystrá v Benešově nad Ploučnicí nad jídelnou - havárie Not disclosed |
- | 9,988,750 |
|
Dodávka 2 ks vozidel kategorie N1, LUV 4x4 s vestavbou do 3,5t Previous tender without bids |
- | 2,371,862 |
|
„Rybníky Výsluní, Starý rybník - rekonstrukce výpustného zařízení, oprava BP a koruny hráze“ Contract modification |
9,394,622 | 2,052,064 (+22%) |
|
Technickobezpečnostní dohled nad vodními díly ve správě Povodí Ohře, státní podnik, v letech 2019 - 2022 Contract modification |
23,104,710 | 1,171,220 (+6%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
PB zeď Ploučnice v Březinách nad mostem (3,900-4,515) Contract modification |
61,500,000 | 10,889,367 (+18%) |
|
Bystrá v Benešově nad Ploučnicí nad jídelnou - havárie Not disclosed |
- | 9,988,750 |
|
Dodávka 2 ks vozidel kategorie N1, LUV 4x4 s vestavbou do 3,5t Previous tender without bids |
- | 2,371,862 |
|
„Rybníky Výsluní, Starý rybník - rekonstrukce výpustného zařízení, oprava BP a koruny hráze“ Contract modification |
9,394,622 | 2,052,064 (+22%) |
|
Technickobezpečnostní dohled nad vodními díly ve správě Povodí Ohře, státní podnik, v letech 2019 - 2022 Contract modification |
23,104,710 | 1,171,220 (+6%) |
|
Bystřice, ř. km 0,077-0,312 (Kozlíky) - rekonstrukce opevnění Contract modification |
12,388,841 | 405,966 (+4%) |
|
VD Blatno - oprava funkčních objektů Contract modification |
6,818,986 | 39,963 (+1%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Result |
|---|---|
| Issued tenders without published result | 2% |
| Cancelled contracts | 14% |
| Average requirements modifications count | 0.20 |
| Average decision length | 46.80 days |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 97) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 97) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 97) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 97) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 97) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 97) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (zakázek z 92 ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.23 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 92 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
