Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Bruntál

IČO 00295892

Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

34%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zimní stadion na Kavalcově ulici v Bruntále
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení ZŠ Okružní v Bruntále
Structures construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba odborných učeben ZŠ Bruntál, Okružní 38 - stavební práce
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce mostu a lávky pro pěší přes Černý potok na MK Květná – Lidická v Bruntále
Bridge renewal construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení bytového domu ul. Květná, Bruntál
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

75%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KARETA s.r.o.
6 33,640,804
BDSTAV MORAVA s.r.o.
1 33,500,000
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
3 20,728,816
TECHARTSTAV s.r.o.
1 17,247,000
ATELIER 11 HRADEC KRÁLOVÉ s.r.o.
2 5,615,000
Other suppliers 24 109,721,302

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

51%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 225,486,116
Small scale tenders 17,409,770
Unregulated purchases 705,496,299
Total 948,392,185

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Cyklostezka Bruntál - Staré Město
Contract modification
6,380,000 1,173,089 (+19%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

58%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.13 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 7 tenders
1000K+ 5 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.