Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Rekonstrukce dešťové zdrže ČOV Polička a zvýšení hydraulické kapacity ČOV
Sewage work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce ul. Fortna, Pálená a Štěpničná v Poličce
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads |
5
Ø6 in industry |
|
Základní škola Na Lukách Polička - vzduchotechnika a Rekonstrukce sociálního zařízení - ZŠ Na Lukách
Construction work for school buildings |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Stavební úpravy obvodového pláště budovy radnice č.p. 2 na Palackého náměstí v Poličce
Construction work for art and cultural buildings |
3
Ø2 in industry |
|
Cyklostezka k Masokombinátu v Poličce
Cycle path construction work |
10
Ø5 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o. |
3 | 20,944,009 |
|
PP-GROUP.cz s.r.o. |
11 | 20,761,450 |
|
Tojapa s.r.o. |
1 | 17,277,726 |
|
Skanska a.s. |
2 | 15,213,052 |
|
BÁČA, Polička s.r.o. |
1 | 13,585,590 |
| Other suppliers | 37 | 140,485,323 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o. |
3 | 20,944,009 |
|
PP-GROUP.cz s.r.o. |
11 | 20,761,450 |
|
Tojapa s.r.o. |
1 | 17,277,726 |
|
Skanska a.s. |
2 | 15,213,052 |
|
BÁČA, Polička s.r.o. |
1 | 13,585,590 |
|
KUNST, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 12,357,328 |
|
KVIS Pardubice a.s. |
1 | 12,357,328 |
|
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
3 | 8,901,454 |
|
O.S.V.O. comp, a.s. |
2 | 8,072,758 |
|
E-STAF s.r.o. |
1 | 6,489,450 |
|
Ulehla Ivan s.r.o. |
3 | 5,337,088 |
|
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s. |
1 | 5,270,516 |
|
CITELUM, a.s. |
1 | 4,491,028 |
|
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
2 | 4,017,084 |
|
STAVOTREND Poříčí s.r.o. |
1 | 3,947,049 |
|
WOMBAT, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,798,768 |
|
WN service s.r.o. |
1 | 3,533,468 |
|
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o. |
1 | 3,273,749 |
|
Apropos Architects s.r.o. |
2 | 2,686,000 |
|
STRABAG a.s. |
1 | 2,559,373 |
|
Okrouhlický s.r.o. |
1 | 2,055,982 |
|
Stavitelství - Háněl s.r.o. |
1 | 1,899,995 |
|
Chameleos s.r.o |
1 | 1,444,677 |
|
AGROCENTRUM ZS, s.r.o. |
1 | 1,291,000 |
|
TG TISK s.r.o. |
1 | 1,265,038 |
|
ESOM s.r.o. |
1 | 1,113,882 |
|
Michal Kortyš |
1 | 862,402 |
|
EKOTOXA s.r.o. |
1 | 828,400 |
|
KONEKO, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 729,600 |
|
Královské lesy s.r.o. |
1 | 653,589 |
|
Ditera, s.r.o. |
1 | 630,946 |
|
Zbyněk Oplištil |
1 | 537,095 |
|
P & L, spol. s r.o. |
1 | 479,000 |
|
Tomáš Marousek |
1 | 249,371 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 0) |
| Nonprice competition | 11% (1 from 9) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 9) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 9) |
| Innovative procedure | 11% (1 from 9) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 263,746,949 |
| Small scale tenders | 107,491,084 |
| Unregulated purchases | 436,675,302 |
| Total | 807,913,336 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 452,328,280 |
| Material consumption | 22,761,728 |
| Energy consumption | 6,438,215 |
| Other consumption | 1,201,663 |
| Sold goods | 77,146 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 585,649 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 91,926,930 |
| Travel costs | 1,618,153 |
| Representation costs | 1,108,831 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 216,868,285 |
| Small long-term property costs | 6,498,203 |
| Other costs | 6,500,253 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 12) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 12) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 12) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 12) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 12) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 12) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.50 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 12 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Cyklostezka k Masokombinátu v Poličce | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Rekonstrukce ul. Otakarova a Václavská v Poličce | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Rekonstrukce ul. Fortna, Pálená a Štěpničná v Poličce | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Stavební úpravy objektu čp. 374, ul. Hegerova v Poličce za vzniku bytových jednotek pro účely sociálního bydlení | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Dodávka elektřiny v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky elektřiny na rok 2022 a 2023 | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| Základní škola Na Lukách Polička - vzduchotechnika a Rekonstrukce sociálního zařízení - ZŠ Na Lukách | Price inconsistent with Journal |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
