Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Polička

IČO 00277177

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

88.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

22%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce dešťové zdrže ČOV Polička a zvýšení hydraulické kapacity ČOV
Sewage work
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. Fortna, Pálená a Štěpničná v Poličce
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
5
Ø6 in industry
Základní škola Na Lukách Polička - vzduchotechnika a Rekonstrukce sociálního zařízení - ZŠ Na Lukách
Construction work for school buildings
2
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy obvodového pláště budovy radnice č.p. 2 na Palackého náměstí v Poličce
Construction work for art and cultural buildings
3
Ø2 in industry
Cyklostezka k Masokombinátu v Poličce
Cycle path construction work
10
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Dlažba Vysoké Mýto, s.r.o.
3 20,944,009
PP-GROUP.cz s.r.o.
11 20,761,450
Tojapa s.r.o.
1 17,277,726
Skanska a.s.
2 15,213,052
BÁČA, Polička s.r.o.
1 13,585,590
Other suppliers 37 140,485,323

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 263,746,949
Small scale tenders 107,491,084
Unregulated purchases 436,675,302
Total 807,913,336

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 12)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 12)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 12)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 12)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 12)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 12)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

70%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.50 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 12 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 13 tenders
1000K+ 26 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.