Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Boskovice

IČO 00279978

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's

88.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

65%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
„Údržba veřejné zeleně v Boskovicích - 2021“
Horticultural services
1
Ø4 in industry
REKONSTRUKCE LETNÍHO KINA, BOSKOVICE – 3. etapa
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
"Komunitní centrum Boskovice - Hrádkov"
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Nemocnice Boskovice Rekonstrukce tepelného zdroje
Heat-exchange units, air-conditioning and refrigerating equipment, and filtering machinery
1
Ø3 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace ul. Milánovy
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

76%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STAVKOM, spol. s r.o.
7 41,929,115
VYKRUT zahradní služby a.s.
1 23,232,219
K.T.S. - MONTÁŽE, s.r.o.
2 11,584,417
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
1 9,894,439
Karel Porč, s.r.o.
4 9,143,582
Other suppliers 52 107,439,812

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 195,847,349
Small scale tenders 125,133,352
Unregulated purchases 519,626,077
Total 840,606,779

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
REKONSTRUKCE LETNÍHO KINA, BOSKOVICE – 3. etapa
Contract modification
14,219,148 2,676,316 (+19%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

36%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 11%
Cancelled contracts 44%
Average requirements modifications count 0.56
Average decision length 76.13 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

63%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 92% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.85 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 13 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 3 tenders
500K-1000K 11 tenders
1000K+ 36 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.