Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
KONCESNÍ ŘÍZENÍ - PROVOZOVÁNÍ DOMOVA PRO SENIORY VE VYSOKÉM MÝTĚ
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
3
Ø2 in industry |
Revitalizace území bývalých kasáren Vysoké Mýto - 1. etapa
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
Revitalizace území bývalých kasáren Vysoké Mýto - 2. etapa
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
ZUŠ - Půdní vestavba multifunkčního prostoru v čp. 100 a čp. 151
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
ZŠ Javornického Vysoké Mýto - rekonstrukce sociálních zařízení: Část 1: Rekonstrukce sociálních zařízení v budově I. stupně Část 2: Rekonstrukce sociálních zařízení v budově II. stupně - Část 2: Rekonstrukce sociálních zařízení v budově II. stupně
Construction work |
8
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
Ledax Vysoké Mýto o.p.s. |
1 | 50,000,000 |
AGILE spol. s r.o. |
2 | 48,392,395 |
ELESTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 11,289,029 |
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
2 | 7,084,843 |
PRVNÍ STAVEBNÍ CHRUDIM a.s. |
1 | 6,669,556 |
Other suppliers | 12 | 134,591,491 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
Ledax Vysoké Mýto o.p.s. |
1 | 50,000,000 |
AGILE spol. s r.o. |
2 | 48,392,395 |
ELESTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 11,289,029 |
Pražská plynárenská, a.s. |
2 | 7,084,843 |
PRVNÍ STAVEBNÍ CHRUDIM a.s. |
1 | 6,669,556 |
AŽD Praha s.r.o. |
1 | 5,651,092 |
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s. |
1 | 3,229,495 |
Alpiq Retail CZ s.r.o. |
1 | 2,845,302 |
PARIO s.r.o. |
1 | 2,226,033 |
KINOEXPORT s.r.o. |
1 | 2,109,000 |
Terchostav spol. s r.o. |
1 | 1,980,505 |
Hasičská vzájemná pojišťovna, a.s. |
1 | 1,666,866 |
Kricner s.r.o. |
1 | 1,433,500 |
PENNANT PART s.r.o. |
1 | 990,433 |
TRANSFORM a.s. Lázně Bohdaneč |
1 | 686,108 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 50% (1 from 2) |
Nonprice competition | 14% (1 from 7) |
Division into lots | 14% (1 from 7) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 7) |
Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 7) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 198,645,018 |
Small scale tenders | 60,987,166 |
Unregulated purchases | 239,601,878 |
Total | 499,234,061 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 322,790,040 |
Material consumption | 11,420,730 |
Energy consumption | 13,386,844 |
Other consumption | 1,051,313 |
Sold goods | 0 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 0 |
Maintenance and repairs | 78,730,723 |
Travel costs | 937,517 |
Representation costs | 1,219,790 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 54,826,465 |
Small long-term property costs | 7,061,827 |
Other costs | 7,808,813 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 11) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 11) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 11) |
Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 11) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 11) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 11) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 36% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.64 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.