Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Holice

IČO 00273571

Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

39%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
REVITALIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU V HOLICÍCH
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Holice využití srážkových vod
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Dodávka TA
Firefighting vehicles
1
Ø1 in industry
Vybudování odborných učeben a zajištění vnitřní konektivity v budovách ZŠ Holice, Holubova 47 - dodávka
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
2
Ø2 in industry
Rozšíření separace odpadu ve městě Holice
Refuse skips
4
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

100%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s.
1 12,985,193
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s.
1 8,761,342
WISS CZECH, s.r.o.
1 3,333,000
BOXED, s.r.o.
1 2,113,449
MEVA-TEC s.r.o.
1 2,071,500
Other suppliers 1 3,333,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

27%
average 27%
Average values displayed

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

46%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 68,854,816
Small scale tenders 3,194,661
Unregulated purchases 266,674,078
Total 338,723,554

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 4)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 4)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 4)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 4)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 4)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 4)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

44%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 4 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 2 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.