Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
REVITALIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU V HOLICÍCH
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
Holice využití srážkových vod
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Dodávka TA
Firefighting vehicles |
1
Ø1 in industry |
|
Vybudování odborných učeben a zajištění vnitřní konektivity v budovách ZŠ Holice, Holubova 47 - dodávka
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
2
Ø2 in industry |
|
Rozšíření separace odpadu ve městě Holice
Refuse skips |
4
Ø2 in industry |
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
REVITALIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU V HOLICÍCH
Construction work |
1
Ø4 in industry |
|
Holice využití srážkových vod
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Dodávka TA
Firefighting vehicles |
1
Ø1 in industry |
|
Vybudování odborných učeben a zajištění vnitřní konektivity v budovách ZŠ Holice, Holubova 47 - dodávka
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
2
Ø2 in industry |
|
Rozšíření separace odpadu ve městě Holice
Refuse skips |
4
Ø2 in industry |
|
HOLICE – STADION DUKELSKÁ, ZDROJE VODY PRO ZÁVLAHY
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
3
Ø2 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s. |
1 | 12,985,193 |
|
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s. |
1 | 8,761,342 |
|
WISS CZECH, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,333,000 |
|
BOXED, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,113,449 |
|
MEVA-TEC s.r.o. |
1 | 2,071,500 |
| Other suppliers | 1 | 3,333,000 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Chládek a Tintěra, Pardubice a.s. |
1 | 12,985,193 |
|
PROFISTAV Litomyšl, a.s. |
1 | 8,761,342 |
|
WISS CZECH, s.r.o. |
1 | 3,333,000 |
|
BOXED, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,113,449 |
|
MEVA-TEC s.r.o. |
1 | 2,071,500 |
|
Voto plyn s.r.o. |
1 | 1,081,212 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 68,854,816 |
| Small scale tenders | 3,194,661 |
| Unregulated purchases | 266,674,078 |
| Total | 338,723,554 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 180,404,610 |
| Material consumption | 11,108,519 |
| Energy consumption | 6,129,248 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 0 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 55,052,812 |
| Travel costs | 378,249 |
| Representation costs | 295,596 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 74,359,116 |
| Small long-term property costs | 6,511,565 |
| Other costs | 4,483,839 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 4) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 4) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 4) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 4) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 4) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 4) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.00 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 4 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| REVITALIZACE SPORTOVNÍHO AREÁLU V HOLICÍCH | Payment information missing |
| Holice využití srážkových vod | Payment information missing |
| Dodávka TA | Payment information missing |
| Rozšíření separace odpadu ve městě Holice | Bidders insonsistent with Journal count |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
