Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Děčín

IČO 00261238

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer uses e-auctions to achieve lower prices.

2.
ranking
80%
Zindex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

48%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Domov pro osoby se zvláštním režimem Křešice
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Zateplení objektů a rekonstrukce zpevněných ploch a oplocení v areálu ZŠ Děčín XXXII, Míru 152
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Nakládání s odpady
Refuse collection services
1
Ø1 in industry
Sběrný dvůr
Refuse collection services
1
Ø1 in industry
Poskytování hlasových a datových služeb
Telephone and data transmission services
3
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

91%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Technické služby Děčín a.s.
20 129,611,693
I S T A R , společnost s ručením omezeným (spol. s r.o.)
1 95,495,466
HARTEX CZ s.r.o.
1 50,368,588
Vodafone Czech Republic a.s.
1 32,794,200
SaM silnice a mosty Děčín a.s.
42 31,121,330
Other suppliers 601 811,110,100

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

69%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 16% (9 from 56)
Nonprice competition 47% (30 from 64)
Division into lots 17% (11 from 64)
E-auction and DPS 16% (10 from 64)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 64)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

75%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 770,830,638
Small scale tenders 425,105,723
Unregulated purchases 907,286,276
Total 2,103,222,637

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Odkanalizování části města Děčín - Horní Oldřichov - I. a II. etapa
Contract modification
26,700,093 6,258,257 (+24%)
Revitalizace veřejného prostranství panelového sídliště Březiny IV. etapa a DC007300 Děčín, Za Sadem - rekonstrukce vodovodu
Contract modification
25,149,905 4,256,770 (+17%)
MULTIFUNKČNÍ SPORTOVIŠTĚ U OBJEKTU ZIMNÍHO STADIONU
Contract modification
27,991,412 3,684,327 (+14%)
Stavební úpravy 1.NP objektu Krásnostudenecká 1525/30, Děčín 6
Contract modification
4,813,339 2,126,997 (+45%)
Klimatizace a odvětrání divadelního sálu Městského divadla Děčín
Contract modification
3,567,000 1,003,393 (+29%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

48%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 4%
Cancelled contracts 32%
Average requirements modifications count 1.04
Average decision length 70.11 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 66)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 66)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 66)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 66)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 66)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 2% (1 from 66)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

98%
average 69%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (zakázek z 60 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.02 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 60 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 331 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 92 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 52 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 68 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.