Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Kyjov

IČO 00285030

Good buyer. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape.

5.
ranking
79%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
MODERNIZACE STÁVAJÍCÍHO MĚSTSKÉHO KOUPALIŠTĚ A NOVOSTAVBA KRYTÉHO PLAVECKÉHO BAZÉNU KYJOV
Construction equipment
5
Ø1 in industry
Kyjov - RS Zahradní a rekonstrukce MK Zahradní
Paths and other metalled surfaces
6
Ø4 in industry
Bytový dům _ Riegrova 385, Kyjov
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy ZŠ Bohuslavice u Kyjova - stavební práce a dodávky nábytku - Část I. - Stavební úpravy základní školy
Construction work for school buildings
6
Ø3 in industry
Kyjov - Rekonstrukce MK ul. Vrchlického
Paths and other metalled surfaces
4
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

98%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Metrostav DIZ s.r.o.
1 142,700,000
Metrostav a.s.
1 142,700,000
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
3 23,658,884
MSO servis spol. s r.o.
1 14,548,500
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
3 13,631,420
Other suppliers 43 381,273,284

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

93%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 431,875,624
Small scale tenders 23,020,140
Unregulated purchases 75,725,049
Total 530,620,813

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

96%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy ZŠ Bohuslavice u Kyjova - stavební práce a dodávky nábytku
Contract modification
10,420,433 2,385,290 (+23%)
Bytový dům _ Riegrova 385, Kyjov
Contract modification
14,548,500 1,783,322 (+13%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 16)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

68%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.25 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 2 tenders
250K-500K 5 tenders
500K-1000K 9 tenders
1000K+ 11 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.