Small cities • 2016

Město Broumov

IČO 00272523

Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids. The supplier portfolio is relatively broad.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

20%
average 59%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

61%
average 51%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Vodovody a kanalizace Náchod, a.s.
1 44,920,000
Prostavby, a.s.
3 18,006,470
Evč s.r.o.
1 8,718,311
Eurovia Cs, a.s.
1 8,665,496
Kerson spol. s r.o.
1 7,800,146
Other suppliers 8 21,649,055

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

61%
average 64%

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

88%
average 84%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Dodávka zemního plynu pro město Broumov a jeho organizace
Předchozí zakázka bez nabídek
- 1,783,526
Víceúčelové školní hřiště v areálu Tužme se v Broumově - jednací řízení bez uveřejnění na dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
- 1,614,196
Víceúčelové školní hřiště v areálu Tužme se v Broumově - jednací řízení bez uveřejnění na dodatečné stavební práce
Dodatečné práce
- 166,078

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

79%
average 69%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 0.17

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

84%
average 80%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 6% (1 from 16)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 16)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 16)
Missing call for tenders 38% (6 from 16)
Missing winning price 0% ( from 16)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% ( from 16)

Supplier rating

Do the risky firms win frequently?   detailed info 

91%
average 85%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Supplier founded less than 180 days before contract award 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier with over 75 % of turnover from public procurement 0% (0 from 16)
Subcontractor share above 50 % 6% (1 from 16)
Supplier demise shortly after contract 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier bankruptcy 0% (0 from 16)
Supplier donating to political party 19% (3 from 16)
Supplier did not publish financial results on time 0% (0 from 16)