Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Broumov

IČO 00272523

Large volume of money is spent without open competition. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Výběr provozovatele čistírny odpadních vod pro projekt: Intenzifikace ČOV v Broumově
Sewage, refuse, cleaning and environmental services
Ø2 in industry
B. j. 21 PB - PČB Broumov
Restoration work
Ø4 in industry
"Zástavba Spořilova, Broumov, k. ú. Broumov 612766" Část I.) Zástavba Spořilova, Broumov, k.ú. Broumov 612766 - Město Broumov,
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Zástavba Spořilova, Broumov, k.ú. Broumov 612766
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø2 in industry
Rekonstrukce bývalé vodárny, Broumov
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Broumovské stavební sdružení s.r.o.
7 60,911,662
Vodovody a kanalizace Náchod, a.s.
1 47,065,650
ELMON spol. s r.o.
12 19,526,538
Alprim CZ s.r.o.
3 19,098,707
3 9,387,698
Other suppliers 47 172,025,243

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 150,156,557
Small scale tenders 108,065,092
Unregulated purchases 259,477,969
Total 517,699,617

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
B. j. 21 PB - PČB Broumov
Contract modification
44,760,516 6,893,331 (+16%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 7)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 7)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 7)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 7)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 7)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 7)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 83% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.17 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 6 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 4 tenders
500K-1000K 17 tenders
1000K+ 24 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.