Buyer profile has high number of errors. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Terminál hromadné dopravy Nová Paka
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Infrastruktura pro výstavbu nových rodinných domů na Vlkově
Construction work |
7
Ø4 in industry |
|
Paleopark Balka s naučnou geostezkou
Construction work |
0
Ø4 in industry |
|
Nízkoprahový klub Novopacko - II. zadání
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Nová Paka - rekonstrukce kanalizace v ul. Ruská - II. etapa
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
Terminál hromadné dopravy Nová Paka
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Infrastruktura pro výstavbu nových rodinných domů na Vlkově
Construction work |
7
Ø4 in industry |
|
Paleopark Balka s naučnou geostezkou
Construction work |
0
Ø4 in industry |
|
Nízkoprahový klub Novopacko - II. zadání
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Nová Paka - rekonstrukce kanalizace v ul. Ruská - II. etapa
Construction work |
5
Ø4 in industry |
|
Nová Paka - rekonstrukce kanalizace v ul. Ruská
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rekonstrukce místních komunikací 2021
Construction work |
6
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rozvoj zeleně v Nové Pace, II. etapa
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
|
Multifunkční samojízdný pracovní stroj s příslušenstvím
Motor vehicles |
1
Ø1 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
2 | 71,507,644 |
|
MIZERA - STAVBY, a.s. |
3 | 40,350,425 |
|
B.C.M. Company s.r.o. |
1 | 13,382,278 |
|
M-SILNICE a.s. |
1 | 7,036,332 |
|
ČEZ ESCO, a.s. |
1 | 6,097,755 |
| Other suppliers | 3 | 40,350,425 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Gardenline s.r.o. |
2 | 71,507,644 |
|
MIZERA - STAVBY, a.s. |
3 | 40,350,425 |
|
B.C.M. Company s.r.o. |
1 | 13,382,278 |
|
M-SILNICE a.s. |
1 | 7,036,332 |
|
ČEZ ESCO, a.s. |
1 | 6,097,755 |
|
ZEBRA GROUP s.r.o. |
1 | 2,143,100 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 1) |
| Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 14) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 14) |
| E-auction and DPS | 0% (0 from 14) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 14) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Nízkoprahový klub Novopacko - II. zadání Contract modification |
13,382,278 | 2,363,501 (+18%) |
|
Contract Reason for negotiated procedure without publication |
Original contract (Kč) | Contract modification / NPWP (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
Nízkoprahový klub Novopacko - II. zadání Contract modification |
13,382,278 | 2,363,501 (+18%) |
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 15) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 15) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 20% (zakázek z 15 ve Věstníku) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.00 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
