Small cities • 2022

Město Nová Paka

IČO 00271888

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

56%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Terminál hromadné dopravy Nová Paka
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry
Infrastruktura pro výstavbu nových rodinných domů na Vlkově
Construction work
7
Ø4 in industry
Paleopark Balka s naučnou geostezkou
Construction work
0
Ø4 in industry
Nízkoprahový klub Novopacko - II. zadání
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Nová Paka - rekonstrukce kanalizace v ul. Ruská - II. etapa
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

57%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Gardenline s.r.o.
2 71,507,644
MIZERA - STAVBY, a.s.
3 40,350,425
B.C.M. Company s.r.o.
1 13,382,278
M-SILNICE a.s.
1 7,036,332
ČEZ ESCO, a.s.
1 6,097,755
Other suppliers 3 40,350,425

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

68%
average 68%
Average values displayed

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Nízkoprahový klub Novopacko - II. zadání
Contract modification
13,382,278 2,363,501 (+18%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

0%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 20% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.