Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Přerov

IČO 00301825

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Court deemed all complaints against buyer invalid or insignificant.

11.
ranking
76%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

59%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

88%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PSS Přerovská stavební a.s.
8 92,899,101
PTÁČEK - pozemní stavby s.r.o.
2 32,460,866
Ing. Josef Kolář - PRINS
1 26,246,243
Kooperativa pojišťovna, a.s., Vienna Insurance Group
1 25,674,000
PB SCOM s.r.o.
2 25,423,032
Other suppliers 123 512,818,200

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

39%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 10)
Nonprice competition 10% (4 from 41)
Division into lots 15% (6 from 41)
E-auction 10% (4 from 41)
Innovative procedure 2% (1 from 41)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

71%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,048,292,985
Small scale tenders 122,181,738
Unregulated purchases 1,175,042,274
Total 2,345,516,998

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

85%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Propagační a reklamní služby
Authorship rights
- 6,000,000
Demolice budovy č.p. 1573 objekt bydlení na pozemku p.č. 740/2 v k.ú. Přerov
Contract modification
18,949,770 2,336,127 (+13%)
Cyklostezka na ulici Palackého v Přerově
Contract modification
11,197,394 2,166,034 (+20%)
Revitalizace vodního ekosystému v Předmostí
Contract modification
6,473,262 1,438,228 (+23%)
Rekonstrukce mostu ev. č. Př/Že-M01 přes Olešnici v obci Žeravice
Contract modification
6,793,751 1,241,172 (+19%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 2% (1 from 43)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 43)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 43)
Missing call for tenders 5% (2 from 43)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 43)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 43)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

64%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 88% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.26 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 42 tenders under the law)
0-250K 4 tenders
250K-500K 2 tenders
500K-1000K 30 tenders
1000K+ 46 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.