Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Most

IČO 00266094

Relatively small fraction of purchases is spent according to law. Buyer does not support competition by using e-auctions, lots or extended deadlines.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce mostu ev. č. 4a-M1 v ul. J. E. Purkyně, Most
Structural products and parts except prefabricated buildings
5
Ø3 in industry
„SNÍŽENÍ ENERGETICKÉ NÁROČNOSTI BUDOVY 3. ZŠ MOST“
Construction work for school buildings
7
Ø4 in industry
„Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy 15. Základní školy v ul. J. A. Komenského č.p. 474, Most - II.“
Restoration work
8
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce azylového domu pro muže
Restoration work
7
Ø4 in industry
Pojištění majetku, odpovědnosti a vozidel
Insurance services
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

87%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Mostecká montážní a.s.
5 92,826,084
HERKUL a.s.
6 51,754,500
Raeder & Falge s.r.o.
1 50,088,560
ČEZ ESCO, a.s.
1 40,263,364
AV MEDIA, a.s.
8 31,587,414
Other suppliers 209 502,520,406

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

26%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 19)
Nonprice competition 5% (3 from 57)
Division into lots 19% (11 from 57)
E-auction 2% (1 from 57)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 57)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

43%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 646,864,918
Small scale tenders 177,399,443
Unregulated purchases 3,544,681,693
Total 4,368,946,054

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

76%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Poskytování služeb Hybridní pošty
Technical exclusivity
- 7,500,000
„SNÍŽENÍ ENERGETICKÉ NÁROČNOSTI BUDOVY 3. ZŠ MOST“
Contract modification
38,664,688 7,023,153 (+19%)
SML Most p.o. - rekonstrukce správní budovy ředitelství - 2. etapa
Contract modification
4,959,328 1,935,727 (+40%)
Stavební úpravy ulice Slovenského národního povstání v Mostě
Contract modification
12,305,639 1,720,609 (+14%)
„Snížení energetické náročnosti budovy 15. Základní školy v ul. J. A. Komenského č.p. 474, Most - II.“
Contract modification
36,187,466 1,514,691 (+5%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

61%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 5%
Cancelled contracts 24%
Average requirements modifications count 0.90
Average decision length 72.15 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 58)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 58)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 58)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 58)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 58)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 58)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

75%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 85% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.36 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 53 tenders under the law)
0-250K 57 tenders
250K-500K 51 tenders
500K-1000K 31 tenders
1000K+ 24 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.