Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Říčany

IČO 00240702

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

12.
ranking
78%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

69%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Provozování VH infrastruktury města Říčany
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
3
Ø2 in industry
Intenzifikace ČOV, Říčany
Sewage work
6
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba mateřské školy Větrník, Říčany
Construction work
13
Ø4 in industry
Vodovod a kanalizace Voděrádky, osazení druhé linky ČOV Voděrádky a veřejné části přípojek
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy budovy ZŠ Kuří- přestavba na mateřskou školu
Construction work for school buildings
6
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
1. SčV, a.s.
2 685,972,192
T4 Building s.r.o.
3 76,955,814
Zlínstav a.s.
1 55,250,419
IMOS Brno, a.s.
1 52,260,841
HES stavební s.r.o.
12 34,016,259
Other suppliers 175 1,110,833,509

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 7% (1 from 15)
Nonprice competition 13% (4 from 31)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 31)
E-auction 0% (0 from 31)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 31)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

100%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 656,244,777
Small scale tenders 848,980,773
Unregulated purchases 0
Total 1,494,729,476

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

83%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy budovy ZŠ Kuří- přestavba na mateřskou školu
Contract modification
15,895,673 3,878,880 (+25%)
Výstavba mateřské školy Větrník, Říčany
Contract modification
55,250,419 3,652,858 (+7%)
Intenzifikace ČOV, Říčany
Contract modification
104,521,682 2,754,968 (+3%)
Rekonstrukce hráze, objektů a odbahnění rybníka Rozpakov
Contract modification
6,417,284 1,501,814 (+24%)
Rekonstrukce ulice Nedbalova, Říčany
Contract modification
7,271,856 862,301 (+12%)

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

97%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 34)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 34)
Missing buyer ID 9% (3 from 34)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 34)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 34)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 3% (1 from 34)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

88%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 91% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.58 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 33 tenders under the law)
0-250K 43 tenders
250K-500K 37 tenders
500K-1000K 33 tenders
1000K+ 37 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

90%
average 81%

Buyer did receive excellent feedback from its tender participants.