Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Doksy

IČO 00260444

Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure. Small number of firms recieve most of contracts.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

50%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Údržba veřejné městské zeleně v Doksech a přidružených obcích
Horticultural services
1
Ø4 in industry
Komunikace a inženýrské sítě - LOKALITA RD - JIH, Doksy
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
4
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunitního centra čp. 47 v Doksech (opakované zadání)
Construction work
12
Ø4 in industry
Zvýšení kapacity MŠ Pražská, Doksy - Nástavba 2. NP hospodářského pavilonu a rekonstrukce kuchyně
Construction work for school buildings
5
Ø3 in industry
Zvýšení kapacity MŠ Pražská, Doksy
Construction work for school buildings
5
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

70%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VERSANA s.r.o.
4 41,238,807
INGSTAV Doksy s.r.o.
32 26,600,577
Bes renova s.r.o.
1 17,908,042
Vodohospodářské stavby, společnost s ručením omezeným
1 17,243,162
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
2 14,671,500
Other suppliers 70 129,505,214

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

25%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 7)
Nonprice competition 5% (1 from 19)
Division into lots 37% (7 from 19)
E-auction 0% (0 from 19)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 19)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

66%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 228,688,949
Small scale tenders 7,038,042
Unregulated purchases 303,346,393
Total 539,073,384

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

76%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce komunitního centra čp. 47 v Doksech (opakované zadání)
Contract modification
14,442,151 3,841,605 (+27%)
Komunikace a inženýrské sítě - LOKALITA RD - JIH, Doksy
Contract modification
17,243,162 2,018,550 (+12%)
PŘESTAVBA KNIHOVNY NA ŠKOLNÍ DRUŽINU A UČEBNU ZUŠ
Contract modification
5,902,996 1,957,145 (+34%)
Údržba veřejné městské zeleně v Doksech a přidružených obcích
Contract modification
17,908,042 673,926 (+4%)
LOKALITA RD - JIH, Doksy - II. etapa - SO 100 - obslužné komunikace
Contract modification
5,299,809 569,881 (+11%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

47%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.16 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 4 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.