Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Jeseník

IČO 00302724

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Energetické úspory bytového domu na ulici U Kasáren Jeseník - blok A a B
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba požární zbrojnice v Jeseníku
Fire station construction work
Ø6 in industry
Multifunkční hřiště s ledovou plochou, Jeseník
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work
Ø3 in industry
Revitalizace ul. Tyršova, Jeseník
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace sídliště Jeseník, 9. května, 3. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KARETA s.r.o.
2 27,316,058
BOBISTAV, s.r.o.
1 24,157,075
Stavební společnost NAVRÁTIL, s.r.o.
1 19,546,000
H + H TECHNIKA, spol. s r.o.
1 18,909,000
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 12,225,000
Other suppliers 21 100,605,072

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 222,019,823
Small scale tenders 43,959,836
Unregulated purchases 482,866,487
Total 748,846,146

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Regenerace sídliště Jeseník, 9. května, 3. etapa
Contract modification
9,707,726 1,725,821 (+18%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.09 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 8 tenders
1000K+ 9 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.