Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Jeseník

IČO 00302724

Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Lot of money goes into historical contracts and unregulated purchases.

70.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

52%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Energetické úspory bytového domu na ulici U Kasáren Jeseník - blok A a B
Construction work for multi-dwelling buildings and individual houses
8
Ø5 in industry
Výstavba požární zbrojnice v Jeseníku
Fire station construction work
3
Ø6 in industry
Multifunkční hřiště s ledovou plochou, Jeseník
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work
1
Ø3 in industry
Revitalizace ul. Tyršova, Jeseník
Construction work for highways, roads
7
Ø5 in industry
Regenerace sídliště Jeseník, 9. května, 3. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

91%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
KARETA s.r.o.
2 27,316,058
BOBISTAV, s.r.o.
1 24,157,075
Stavební společnost NAVRÁTIL, s.r.o.
1 19,546,000
H + H TECHNIKA, spol. s r.o.
1 18,909,000
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
2 12,225,000
Other suppliers 21 100,605,072

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

60%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 222,019,823
Small scale tenders 43,959,836
Unregulated purchases 482,866,487
Total 748,846,146

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

94%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Regenerace sídliště Jeseník, 9. května, 3. etapa
Contract modification
9,707,726 1,725,821 (+18%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

69%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.09 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 8 tenders
1000K+ 9 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.