Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Šternberk

IČO 00299529

Buyer profile has high number of errors. There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Construction work for sports facilities
Ø4 in industry
Bytové domy Bezručova 20 a 22
Houses construction work
Ø5 in industry
Atletický stadion Šternberk, 1. etapa - atletický stadion a terénní úpravy
Construction work for sports facilities
Ø3 in industry
Stavební úpravy komunikace Generála Eliáše
Road construction works
Ø6 in industry
Šternberk – lokalita Příkopy
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
3 180,468,627
Online-olin s.r.o.
3 35,060,723
NOSTA, s.r.o.
1 33,819,936
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o.
1 28,880,000
LANEX Olomouc s.r.o.
2 26,473,836
Other suppliers 36 404,130,359

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 4)
Nonprice competition 4% (1 from 27)
Division into lots 15% (4 from 27)
E-auction 0% (0 from 27)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 27)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 397,192,020
Small scale tenders 95,087,386
Unregulated purchases 491,075,707
Total 983,355,112

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Šternberk – lokalita Příkopy
Contract modification
15,286,454 1,237,665 (+9%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 27)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 27)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 27)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 27)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 27)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 27)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.26 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 27 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 5 tenders
1000K+ 6 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.