Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Moravské Budějovice

IČO 00289931

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Rekonstrukce technické infrastruktury v lokalitě Mexiko
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce mostu na ulici Havlíčkova - II
Works for complete or part construction and civil engineering work
Ø4 in industry
Úprava povrchů místních komunikací Jackov
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce mostu na ulici Havlíčkova - II
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
1 58,372,362
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
6 18,491,678
3 14,735,808
PORR a.s.
1 9,923,066
PELÁN stav, s.r.o.
1 4,955,000

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Average values displayed

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 181,579,290
Small scale tenders 30,000
Unregulated purchases 363,772,053
Total 545,381,344

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce technické infrastruktury v lokalitě Mexiko
Contract modification
58,372,362 4,280,325 (+8%)
Dodávka elektřiny v rámci sdružených služeb dodávky elektřiny na rok 2021
Not disclosed
- 2,667,978
Rekonstrukce mostu na ulici Havlíčkova - II
Contract modification
9,923,066 610,360 (+7%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 44% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.33 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.