Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Pec pod Sněžkou

IČO 00278181

Enough firms are competing for contracts. Competitions are open to multiple bidders.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

69%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
"Přístavba a rekonstrukce MŠ, Pec pod Sněžkou"
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
PEC POD SNĚŽKOU - OBŘÍ DŮL: OPRAVA ÚČELOVÉ KOMUNIKACE LANOVKA - KAPLIČKA
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
2
Ø2 in industry
Provozování parkovacího systému ve městě Pec pod Sněžkou
Supporting and auxiliary transport services; travel agencies services
3
Ø1 in industry
Oprava komunikací v Peci pod Sněžkou ve Velké Úpě
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
2
Ø2 in industry
Velká Úpa - odstranění objektu č.p. 132 URAN v k.ú. Velká Úpa II
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
5
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
3K stavby s.r.o.
5 9,058,079
Tlachač s.r.o.
2 3,515,108
REPARE TRUTNOV s.r.o.
1 2,969,110
O.K. SLUZBY PRAHA, S.R.O.
1 2,910,000
Kis střechy s.r.o.
1 1,940,403
Other suppliers 10 13,942,718

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

27%
average 27%
Average values displayed

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

70%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 226,209,822
Small scale tenders 23,606,966
Unregulated purchases 256,621,886
Total 506,438,675

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 4)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 4)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 4)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 4)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 4)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 4)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 75% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 4 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 11 tenders
1000K+ 4 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.