Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Domažlice

IČO 00253316

Good buyer. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

38.
ranking
73%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

29%
average 47%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

94%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
OHL ŽS, a.s.
1 291,880,114
Metrostav a.s.
1 113,911,616
morez stavební s.r.o.
4 79,059,501
Lesní stavby, s.r.o.
6 54,568,109
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
3 42,376,279
Other suppliers 63 135,285,436

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

28%
average 32%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 78% (18 from 23)
Nonprice competition 8% (3 from 39)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 39)
E-auction 0% (0 from 39)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 39)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

84%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 624,962,546
Small scale tenders 84,951,701
Unregulated purchases 292,465,297
Total 1,002,379,544

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
DOSTAVBA PIVOVARU - Kulturní centrum Domažlice
Contract modification
113,911,616 8,972,517 (+8%)
Domažlice, Fügnerova č.p. 647 - Zateplení objektu sportovní haly
Previous tender without bids
- 6,317,387
Domažlice - zateplení objektu klubovny Junák
Contract modification
1,777,259 196,090 (+12%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

71%
average 64%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 26%
Average requirements modifications count 0.65
Average decision length 39.13 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 47)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 47)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 47)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 47)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 47)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 47)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

60%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.02 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 47 tenders under the law)
0-250K 8 tenders
250K-500K 5 tenders
500K-1000K 12 tenders
1000K+ 15 tenders