Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Neratovice

IČO 00237108

Court found serious misconduct. Large volume of money is spent without open competition.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Přístavba Domu Kněžny Emmy, Neratovice
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Přístavba ZŠ Ing. M. Plesingera - Božinova, Neratovice
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Výstavba zastávky Neratovice - Sídliště
Intercity railway works
Ø2 in industry
Školící středisko pro JSDH Neratovice
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce komunikace ulice Palackého, II. etapa
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
PSG Construction a.s.
1 124,619,956
EMH stavební CZ s.r.o.
4 87,597,190
OK Stavby s.r.o.
10 35,312,695
1 24,193,033
2 8,432,000
Other suppliers 62 358,124,814

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 368,944,086
Small scale tenders 75,582,982
Unregulated purchases 614,743,845
Total 1,059,270,914

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Sdružené služby dodávky elektřiny na roky 2022 a 2023
Outside directive scope
- 6,525,042
Rekonstrukce ulice P. Bezruče, Neratovice
Outside directive scope
- 6,055,201
Výstavba zastávky Neratovice - Sídliště
Contract modification
24,193,033 5,883,013 (+25%)
Rekonstrukce komunikace ulice Palackého, II. etapa
Contract modification
13,899,076 4,167,895 (+30%)
Přístavba Domu Kněžny Emmy, Neratovice
Contract modification
124,619,956 3,886,731 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 17%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 3.17
Average decision length 80.00 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 82% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.53 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 3 tenders
500K-1000K 20 tenders
1000K+ 26 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.