Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Benátky nad Jizerou

IČO 00237442

Buyer profile has high number of errors. The competition for contracts is low.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Přístavba zázemí a stavební úpravy v areálu koupaliště a zimního stadionu – I. etapa
Construction work for sports facilities
2
Ø3 in industry
Stará radnice v Benátkách nad Jizerou
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce polikliniky Benátky n/J
Construction work for buildings relating to health
5
Ø2 in industry
Revitalizace vnitrobloků sídliště Na Burze
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
2
Ø6 in industry
Svoz a odstranění odpadu na území města Benátky nad Jizerou
Refuse collection services
2
Ø1 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

84%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SYNER, s.r.o.
1 48,487,472
SARK engineering, s.r.o.
2 35,597,881
H-INTES s.r.o.
2 13,807,880
STRABAG a.s.
1 12,608,555
AVE CZ odpadové hospodářství s.r.o.
1 11,922,070
Other suppliers 4 30,097,550

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

18%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

58%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 181,232,314
Small scale tenders 53,312,019
Unregulated purchases 470,908,259
Total 705,452,592

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 11)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 11)
Missing buyer ID 9% (1 from 11)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 11)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 11)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 11)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

14%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 64% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.73 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 11 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 3 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.