Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Hronov

IČO 00272680

Uncompetitive procedures are overused. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
II/303 Velké Poříčí - Hronov - I. etapa
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
4
Ø6 in industry
Rekonstrukce a modernizace víceúčelového stadionu Hronov
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Stavební úpravy a přístavba č.p. 5
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Sběr, přeprava a odstraňování odpadu Hronov
Refuse collection services
1
Ø1 in industry
SOCIÁLNÍ BYDLENÍ HRONOV - PAPÍRNA
Construction work
5
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

96%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
VYSSPA Sports Technology s.r.o.
1 56,698,051
STATING s.r.o.
1 40,759,869
Vše pro stavby s.r.o.
4 32,842,494
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 30,255,900
STRABAG a.s.
1 30,255,900
Other suppliers 43 263,960,022

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

23%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

87%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 261,006,971
Small scale tenders 34,484,043
Unregulated purchases 92,981,419
Total 388,472,433

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

67%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
II/303 Velké Poříčí - Hronov - I. etapa
Contract modification
60,511,800 16,351,030 (+28%)
SOCIÁLNÍ BYDLENÍ HRONOV - PAPÍRNA
Contract modification
19,998,880 6,084,372 (+31%)
Zvýšení odolnosti hasičské zbrojnice JSDH Hronov
Contract modification
7,555,003 493,949 (+7%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

53%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 38%
Average requirements modifications count 0.88
Average decision length 63.50 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 13% (2 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

38%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 53% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 13 tenders
1000K+ 15 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.