Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Rokycany

IČO 00259047

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Rekonstrukce zeleně v Litohlavské ul. v Rokycanech vč. rekonstrukce komunikace nezbytné pro obnovu lipové aleje
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce fasády NS Žďár
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. Palackého v Rokycanech
Repair, maintenance and associated services related to roads and other equipment
Ø1 in industry
Služby v odpadovém hospodářství - město Rokycany
Refuse collection services
Ø1 in industry
„Překládací stanice směsníího komunálního odpadu Rokycany“
Construction work
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BAGGER BS s.r.o.
1 27,945,000
Rumpold - R Rokycany s.r.o.
3 22,090,644
EUbuilding a.s.
1 21,970,133
BERDYCH plus spol. s r.o.
1 18,898,426
Lesní stavby, s.r.o.
1 13,993,000
Other suppliers 16 153,944,994

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (2 from 6)
Nonprice competition 17% (4 from 24)
Division into lots 4% (1 from 24)
E-auction 0% (0 from 24)
Innovative procedure 4% (1 from 24)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 254,047,054
Small scale tenders 2,721,012
Unregulated purchases 715,223,212
Total 971,991,278

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 29%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.43
Average decision length 42.60 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 4% (1 from 24)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 24)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 24)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.09 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 22 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 1 tender

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.