Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
---|---|
Rekonstrukce zeleně v Litohlavské ul. v Rokycanech vč. rekonstrukce komunikace nezbytné pro obnovu lipové aleje
Construction work |
9
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce fasády NS Žďár
Construction work |
3
Ø4 in industry |
Rekonstrukce ul. Palackého v Rokycanech
Repair, maintenance and associated services related to roads and other equipment |
2
Ø1 in industry |
Služby v odpadovém hospodářství - město Rokycany
Refuse collection services |
2
Ø1 in industry |
„Překládací stanice směsníího komunálního odpadu Rokycany“
Construction work |
2
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
---|---|---|
BAGGER BS s.r.o. |
1 | 27,945,000 |
Rumpold - R Rokycany s.r.o. |
3 | 22,090,644 |
EUbuilding a.s. |
1 | 21,970,133 |
BERDYCH plus spol. s r.o. |
1 | 18,898,426 |
Lesní stavby, s.r.o. |
1 | 13,993,000 |
Other suppliers | 16 | 153,944,994 |
Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
---|---|---|
BAGGER BS s.r.o. |
1 | 27,945,000 |
Rumpold - R Rokycany s.r.o. |
3 | 22,090,644 |
EUbuilding a.s. |
1 | 21,970,133 |
BERDYCH plus spol. s r.o. |
1 | 18,898,426 |
Lesní stavby, s.r.o. |
1 | 13,993,000 |
Stavební firma HOBST a.s. |
1 | 12,821,216 |
STAVBY-KAMENICTVÍ s.r.o. |
1 | 12,557,856 |
MIRAS - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o. |
1 | 10,511,915 |
SUPTel a.s. |
1 | 8,032,151 |
Vodohospodářská společnost Sokolov, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,986,162 |
BERGER BOHEMIA a.s. |
1 | 5,872,475 |
SaJ a.s. |
2 | 5,442,024 |
KOVO KASEJOVICE KLIMA, S.R.O. |
1 | 4,299,900 |
TT Ice-snow s.r.o. |
1 | 3,399,000 |
SDO Technika s.r.o. |
1 | 2,114,100 |
MB Bau s.r.o. |
1 | 2,028,287 |
Rusina Frei, s.r.o. |
1 | 2,000,000 |
Bohemik s.r.o. |
1 | 1,425,325 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
Tool | Contracts count |
---|---|
Extended deadlines | 33% (2 from 6) |
Nonprice competition | 17% (4 from 24) |
Division into lots | 4% (1 from 24) |
E-auction | 0% (0 from 24) |
Innovative procedure | 4% (1 from 24) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
---|---|
Public procurement | 254,047,054 |
Small scale tenders | 2,721,012 |
Unregulated purchases | 715,223,212 |
Total | 971,991,278 |
Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
---|---|
Durable property purchases | 430,263,490 |
Material consumption | 26,358,056 |
Energy consumption | 67,833,239 |
Other consumption | 0 |
Sold goods | 605,662 |
Activation of durable property | 0 |
Activation of consumable property | 0 |
Change of stock | 0 |
Maintenance and repairs | 175,851,887 |
Travel costs | 707,768 |
Representation costs | 1,238,010 |
In-house services | 0 |
Other services | 242,071,761 |
Small long-term property costs | 22,071,447 |
Other costs | 4,989,959 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Type of flaw | Result |
---|---|
Issued tenders without published result | 29% |
Cancelled contracts | 0% |
Average requirements modifications count | 0.43 |
Average decision length | 42.60 days |
Contract | Modifications count | Cancelled | Without results | Decision length |
---|---|---|---|---|
Realizace varovných protipovodňových opatření pro město Rokycany | 0 | 45 | ||
II/605 ul. Jiráskova, Rokycany | 2 | > 90 | ||
Revitalizace Husových sadů a Kalvárie v Rokycanech - I. etapa | 0 | > 90 | ||
Výměna zasklení části výplní otvorů plaveckého bazénu Rokycany | 0 | 64 | ||
Plavecký bazén Rokycany - výměna vzduchotechnických jednotek pro velký a malý bazén | 0 | 38 | ||
REVITALIZACE AREÁLU SOKOLOVNY V ROKYCANECH, NOVÉ CENTRUM KULTURY | 0 | 3 | ||
Služby v odpadovém hospodářství - město Rokycany | 1 | 63 |
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
Type of flaw | Contracts count |
---|---|
Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 24) |
Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 24) |
Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 24) |
Missing call for tenders | 4% (1 from 24) |
Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 24) |
Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 24) |
Contract | Type of flaw |
---|---|
Správa portfolia města Rokycany ve výši maximálně 101 miliónů Kč za podmínky garance vrácení investované jistiny | Missing call for tenders |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
Check | Result | ||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 50% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 1.09 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 22 tenders under the law) |
|
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.