Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Rokycany

IČO 00259047

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

51.
ranking
74%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

61%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce zeleně v Litohlavské ul. v Rokycanech vč. rekonstrukce komunikace nezbytné pro obnovu lipové aleje
Construction work
9
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce fasády NS Žďár
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce ul. Palackého v Rokycanech
Repair, maintenance and associated services related to roads and other equipment
2
Ø1 in industry
Služby v odpadovém hospodářství - město Rokycany
Refuse collection services
2
Ø1 in industry
„Překládací stanice směsníího komunálního odpadu Rokycany“
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

97%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
BAGGER BS s.r.o.
1 27,945,000
Rumpold - R Rokycany s.r.o.
3 22,090,644
EUbuilding a.s.
1 21,970,133
BERDYCH plus spol. s r.o.
1 18,898,426
Lesní stavby, s.r.o.
1 13,993,000
Other suppliers 16 153,944,994

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

49%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 33% (2 from 6)
Nonprice competition 17% (4 from 24)
Division into lots 4% (1 from 24)
E-auction 0% (0 from 24)
Innovative procedure 4% (1 from 24)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

51%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 254,047,054
Small scale tenders 2,721,012
Unregulated purchases 715,223,212
Total 971,991,278

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

86%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 29%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.43
Average decision length 42.60 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 24)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 24)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 24)
Missing call for tenders 4% (1 from 24)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 24)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 24)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

12%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 50% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.09 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 22 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 1 tender

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.