Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Prachatice

IČO 00250627

Good buyer. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

21.
ranking
77%
zIndex
Show average values  
62%
Bidder participation
93%
Winner concentration
0%
Pro-competitive tools
62%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
91%
Competitive contracting
90%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
88%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Modernizace komunikací II. třídy P12 A - část 3
Construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce letního kina Prachatice - stavební práce
Construction work
8
Ø4 in industry
„Zvýšení akumulace vodního zdroje Fefry“
Ancillary works for pipelines and cables
3
Ø5 in industry
Revitalizace Štěpánčina parku, Prachatice - 2. kolo“
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Centrum ekologické výchovy Dřípatka
Construction work for buildings relating to education and research
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
LUSPOL SE
 2 48,378,937
STRABAG a.s.
 7 47,546,602
PROTOM Strakonice, s.r.o.
 2 27,980,000
SaM silnice a mosty a.s.
 1 22,486,165
SABBIA, s. r. o.
 1 16,776,477
Other suppliers 150 267,969,450

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

62%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 250,990,147
Small scale tenders 99,820,914
Unregulated purchases 573,418,504
Total 924,229,565

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

91%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce letního kina Prachatice - stavební práce
Contract modification 		42,857,088 3,341,128 (+8%)
STAVBA MALORÁŽKOVÉ STŘELNICE Prachatice
Contract modification 		5,521,849 570,146 (+11%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

90%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 0%
Average requirements modifications count 0.80
Average decision length 36.40 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 14)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 14)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 14)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 14)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 14)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 14)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

88%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 93% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.71 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law)
0-250K 62 tenders
250K-500K 28 tenders
500K-1000K 28 tenders
1000K+ 27 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.