Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Vlašim

IČO 00232947

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer recieves unusually small ammount of bids.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

22%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Zvýšení bezpečnosti chodců v ulicích Velíšská a Zámecká, Vlašim
Paths and other metalled surfaces
2
Ø4 in industry
OPRAVA MÍSTNÍ KOMUNIKACE NAVRÁTILOVA VE MĚSTĚ VLAŠIM
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
3
Ø6 in industry
Zvýšení bezpečnosti chodců v ulici Riegrova, Vlašim
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Oprava místní komunikace v ulici Družstevní, Vlašim
Construction work for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry
Varovný a informační systém města Vlašim
Transmission apparatus for radiotelephony, radiotelegraphy, radio broadcasting and television
2
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

51%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
3 35,795,887
MIZERA - STAVBY, a.s.
1 20,486,765
C SYSTEM CZ a.s.
3 9,991,717
Stavební firma Pazdera s.r.o.
1 6,906,363
TT Ice-snow s.r.o.
1 3,500,000
Other suppliers 6 38,409,116

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

30%
average 27%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

43%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 139,647,339
Small scale tenders 5,137,177
Unregulated purchases 631,625,092
Total 776,409,609

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

100%
average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

36%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 89% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.11 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 1 tender
1000K+ 3 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.