Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Studénka

IČO 00298441

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. Buyer does not avoid following procurement law.

21.
ranking
77%
Zindex
Show average values  
55%
Bidder participation
88%
Winner concentration
33%
Pro-competitive tools
87%
Public procurement share on total purchases
100%
Legal misconduct
87%
Competitive contracting
60%
Consistent conduct
100%
Journal data quality
82%
Buyer profile data quality
80%
Supplier feedback

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

55%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry 		Bids
Sběr, svoz, využívání a zneškodňování komunálních odpadů ve městě Studénka
Refuse and waste related services
1
Ø1 in industry
Stavební úpravy a přístavba krytého bazénu ve Studénce
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Rekonstrukce školních kuchyní ZŠ Sjednocení a ZŠ FKT (TGM) - Rekonstrukce školních kuchyní ZŠ Sjednocení a ZŠ FKT (TGM) - stavební práce
Construction work for buildings relating to leisure, sports, culture, lodging and restaurants
6
Ø3 in industry
Novostavba chodníkového tělesa na ul. Butovická III. etapa vč. vybudování nového místa pro přecházení, točny a kanalizace
Construction work
3
Ø4 in industry
„Zimní údržba a očista města Studénky“
Cleaning and sanitation services in urban or rural areas, and related services
1
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

88%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
OZO Ostrava s.r.o.
 2 63,509,088
HRASPO spol. s r.o.
 2 28,502,671
BERNDORF BÄDERBAU s.r.o.
 1 21,627,615
COLAS CZ, a.s.
 2 18,774,954
VYKRUT zahradní služby a.s.
 2 16,465,439
Other suppliers 115 264,446,031

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

87%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 344,874,487
Small scale tenders 112,771,584
Unregulated purchases 146,110,990
Total 603,757,061

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication 		Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Cyklistická stezka Studénka - Nová Horka - opakované řízení
Contract modification 		11,425,000 2,954,288 (+26%)
EO budova na ulici Tovární - opakované řízení
Contract modification 		6,799,562 2,000,611 (+30%)
Cyklostezka ve Studénce
Contract modification 		8,646,817 1,286,982 (+15%)
Infrastruktura lokality Panská
Contract modification 		7,886,181 1,073,759 (+14%)
Parkovací plochy za budovou MěÚ Studénka
Contract modification 		6,749,448 232,890 (+4%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 1.40
Average decision length 59.80 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 18)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 18)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 18)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 18)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 18)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 18)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

82%
average 49%
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 94% (zakázek z 18 ve Věstníku)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.61 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 18 tenders under the law)
0 - 250k Kč 44 zakázek
250k - 500k Kč 33 zakázek
500k - 1m Kč 12 zakázek
more than 1mil Kč 13 zakázek

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.