Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Holešov

IČO 00287172

Considerable volume of contracts goes only to few firms. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Stavební úpravy budovy rehabilitačního centra Tovární č.p. 1081, Holešov _ I.etapa
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Humanizace centra pro seniory v Holešově
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Vodovod Količín
Construction work for water and sewage pipelines
Ø4 in industry
Holešov-revitalizace místních komunikací, 1.etapa-ul.Grohova
Paths and other metalled surfaces
Ø4 in industry
Úklid a údržba veřejných prostranství Města Holešova
Cleaning and sanitation services in urban or rural areas, and related services
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
RAPOS, spol. s r.o.
2 148,559,390
Vodohospodářské stavby Javorník-CZ s.r.o.
1 22,084,547
SMO a.s.
1 16,134,563
Technické služby Holešov, s.r.o.
1 14,485,248
KKS, spol. s r.o.
1 13,294,737
Other suppliers 2 148,559,390

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 2)
Nonprice competition 20% (2 from 10)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 10)
E-auction 0% (0 from 10)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 10)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 285,631,208
Small scale tenders 0
Unregulated purchases 343,807,243
Total 629,438,451

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
No contracts in negotiated procedure without publication.

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 14%
Cancelled contracts 14%
Average requirements modifications count 0.29
Average decision length 75.83 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 10)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 10)
Missing buyer ID 10% (1 from 10)
Missing call for tenders 10% (1 from 10)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 10)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 10)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 0% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.00 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 9 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.