Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Pelhřimov

IČO 00248801

Buyer has seriously violated procurement law. Tender documentation is well prepared, thus there is no need to modify or cancel the procedure.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

71%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SWIETELSKY stavební s.r.o.
8 97,184,186
VHST s.r.o.
2 60,918,215
Petr Čeněk
9 52,872,781
STATUS stavební a.s.
9 52,720,199
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
2 32,554,151
Other suppliers 50 335,611,671

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 5)
Nonprice competition 0% (0 from 21)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 21)
E-auction 81% (17 from 21)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 21)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

69%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 370,513,701
Small scale tenders 148,751,382
Unregulated purchases 580,269,183
Total 1,099,534,266

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
ZTV pro RD PELHŘIMOV - SKRÝŠOV
Contract modification
37,949,215 1,467,768 (+4%)
Plavecký bazén - Pelhřimov
Contract modification
6,880,000 1,015,000 (+15%)
Rekonstrukce fotbalových hřišť a atletického oválu včetně sektoru skoku do dálky
Contract modification
30,501,221 314,219 (+2%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

80%
average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

54%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 86% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.57 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 21 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 10 tenders
1000K+ 31 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.