Large cities • 2022 • past ranking

Statutární město Mladá Boleslav

IČO 00238295

Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

30%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Opravy a údržba komunikací, chodníků a parkovišť včetně dopravního značení na území města Mladá Boleslav
Road equipment
1
Ø2 in industry
Čištění města a zimní údržba
Cleaning and sanitation services in urban or rural areas, and related services
2
Ø2 in industry
Implementace dopravní telematiky na území města Mladá Boleslav
Miscellaneous transport equipment and spare parts
0
Ø2 in industry
Implementace dopravní telematiky na území města Mladá Boleslav
Miscellaneous transport equipment and spare parts
1
Ø2 in industry
Nábřežní cyklostezka
Paths and other metalled surfaces
6
Ø4 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

92%
average 91%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
SPRÁVA KOMUNIKACÍ s.r.o.
7 172,650,505
COMPAG MLADÁ BOLESLAV s.r.o.
1 138,883,640
H-INTES s.r.o.
14 100,315,304
SWARCO TRAFFIC CZ s.r.o.
1 95,821,431
Chládek & Tintěra, a.s.
1 59,707,235
Other suppliers 70 749,992,465

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

2%
average 41%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 24)
Nonprice competition 2% (1 from 45)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 45)
E-auction 0% (0 from 45)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 45)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

59%
average 66%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 1,237,492,774
Small scale tenders 59,648,411
Unregulated purchases 2,444,179,843
Total 3,741,321,028

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

82%
average 79%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Zabezpečovací práce mostu na Havlíčkově ulici
Emergency
- 25,000,000
Nástavba domova pro seniory ul. Olbrachtova čp. 1390/II, Mladá Boleslav
Contract modification
27,876,840 5,448,631 (+20%)
Rekonstrukce ulice Pražské v Bezděčíně - II. etapa, vč. cyklostezky
Contract modification
20,959,788 3,120,298 (+15%)
Novostavba mateřské školy Pampeliška
Contract modification
26,699,707 2,067,034 (+8%)
Novostavba mateřské školy Michalovice – spotřebiče
Contract modification
639,265 79,089 (+13%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

78%
average 56%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 10%
Average requirements modifications count 0.70
Average decision length 56.65 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 100%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 48)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 48)
Missing buyer ID 2% (1 from 48)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 48)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 48)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 48)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

53%
average 69%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 96% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.54 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 48 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 4 tenders
500K-1000K 23 tenders
1000K+ 17 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 86%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.