Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Rakovník

IČO 00244309

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Buyer does not modify or cancel tenders which fosters competition.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

62%
average 51%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

83%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
POHL cz, a.s.
1 88,578,936
Froněk, spol. s r.o.
4 46,267,989
EKOSTAVBY Louny s.r.o.
1 10,898,200
STAVKOM Veletice s.r.o.
1 10,556,211
VIAMONT Servis a.s.
1 10,198,308
Other suppliers 12 140,962,983

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

20%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 0% (0 from 7)
Nonprice competition 5% (1 from 20)
Division into lots 10% (2 from 20)
E-auction 5% (1 from 20)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 20)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

63%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 468,155,280
Small scale tenders 1,075,320
Unregulated purchases 718,574,299
Total 1,187,804,899

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

97%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Stavební úpravy podkroví 2. ŽŠ Rakovník
Contract modification
9,938,611 1,045,324 (+11%)
Víceúčelové studijní a společenské centrum Rakovník - opakování
Contract modification
88,578,936 310,481 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

75%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 17%
Average requirements modifications count 1.67
Average decision length 64.17 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

99%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 5% (1 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

17%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 95% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 2.55 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 20 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 0 tenders
500K-1000K 0 tenders
1000K+ 2 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.