Buyer does not use tools to support competition. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.
Is the level of competition satisfactory? detailed info
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
VÝBĚR PROVOZOVATELE VODOHOSPODÁŘSKÉHO MAJETKU MĚSTA SUŠICE
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
2
Ø2 in industry |
|
Sportovní hala Sušice
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work |
7
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rozvojové území Pod Kalichem, Sušice
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads |
6
Ø6 in industry |
|
Sušice II -zateplení panelových domů č.p. 718-719, ulice 5.května a č.p. 720 -721 ulice U Kapličky
Construction work for houses |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Sušice - Denní stacionář Klíček
Structures construction work |
3
Ø3 in industry |
|
Largest contracts Industry |
Bids |
|---|---|
|
VÝBĚR PROVOZOVATELE VODOHOSPODÁŘSKÉHO MAJETKU MĚSTA SUŠICE
Buyer profile data - no industry specification |
2
Ø2 in industry |
|
Sportovní hala Sušice
Multi-purpose sports facilities construction work |
7
Ø4 in industry |
|
Rozvojové území Pod Kalichem, Sušice
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads |
6
Ø6 in industry |
|
Sušice II -zateplení panelových domů č.p. 718-719, ulice 5.května a č.p. 720 -721 ulice U Kapličky
Construction work for houses |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Sušice - Denní stacionář Klíček
Structures construction work |
3
Ø3 in industry |
|
Sušice - zateplení panelových domů č.p. 1163 - 1168, ul. Kaštanová
Construction work for houses |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Lesopark Pod Kalichem v Sušici - stavební část
Construction work for dams and similar fixed structures |
1
Ø6 in industry |
|
Sušice II, zateplení panelových domů č.p. 1158 a 1159, ul. Kaštanová
Construction work for houses |
3
Ø4 in industry |
|
Sušice II, zateplení panelových domů č.p. 1160 a 1161, ul. Kaštanová
Construction work for houses |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
ÚV Sušice - celková obnova řídicího systému, M+R a elektroinstalace
Miscellaneous general and special-purpose machinery |
4
Ø1 in industry |
|
Nákup nové cisternové automobilové stříkačky pro město Sušice - JSDHO Volšovy
Water-tender vehicles |
1
Ø1 in industry |
|
SUŠICE - VOLŠOVY - ZÁSOBOVÁNÍ PITNOU VODOU III. ETAPA
Construction work |
4
Ø4 in industry |
|
Lesopark Pod Kalichem v Sušici - vegetační úpravy
Planting and maintenance services of green areas |
2
Ø4 in industry |
Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms? detailed info
| Largest suppliers | Contracts count | Contracts volume Kč |
|---|---|---|
|
ČEVAK a.s. |
1 | 351,178,010 |
|
HSF System SK, s.r.o. |
1 | 144,346,430 |
|
Silnice Klatovy a.s. |
1 | 41,385,584 |
|
eSVe Stav s.r.o. |
2 | 24,324,549 |
|
STROMMY COMPANY s.r.o. |
2 | 14,821,326 |
| Other suppliers | 9 | 113,828,661 |
| Supplier | Contracts count | Contracts volume (Kč) |
|---|---|---|
|
ČEVAK a.s. |
1 | 351,178,010 |
|
HSF System SK, s.r.o. |
1 | 144,346,430 |
|
Silnice Klatovy a.s. |
1 | 41,385,584 |
|
eSVe Stav s.r.o. |
2 | 24,324,549 |
|
STROMMY COMPANY s.r.o. |
2 | 14,821,326 |
|
MIRAS - stavitelství a sanace s.r.o. |
1 | 13,793,556 |
|
RYNOSTAV s.r.o. |
1 | 13,573,377 |
|
IVPS Inženýrská výstavba a pozemní stavby s.r.o. |
1 | 12,772,710 |
|
Elektric-Hranice s.r.o. |
1 | 11,218,471 |
|
THT Polička, s.r.o. |
1 | 5,365,000 |
|
ŠAFINVEST, s.r.o. |
1 | 4,288,175 |
|
EHL & KOUMAR ARCHITEKTI s.r.o. |
1 | 3,997,000 |
Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools? detailed info
| Tool | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Extended deadlines | 0% (0 from 4) |
| Nonprice competition | 0% (0 from 13) |
| Division into lots | 0% (0 from 13) |
| E-auction | 0% (0 from 13) |
| Innovative procedure | 0% (0 from 13) |
What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law? detailed info
| Purchases | Volume (Kč) |
|---|---|
| Public procurement | 284,833,220 |
| Small scale tenders | 351,178,010 |
| Unregulated purchases | 250,931,829 |
| Total | 886,943,059 |
| Budget item | Objem prostredku Kč |
|---|---|
| Durable property purchases | 393,492,909 |
| Material consumption | 18,867,372 |
| Energy consumption | 17,376,067 |
| Other consumption | 0 |
| Sold goods | 1,081,873 |
| Activation of durable property | 0 |
| Activation of consumable property | 0 |
| Change of stock | 0 |
| Maintenance and repairs | 220,071,366 |
| Travel costs | 739,668 |
| Representation costs | 1,123,183 |
| In-house services | 0 |
| Other services | 217,407,454 |
| Small long-term property costs | 7,372,849 |
| Other costs | 9,410,319 |
Did buyer violate law significantly? detailed info
How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures? detailed info
Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications? detailed info
Does buyer publish vital data in official journal? detailed info
| Type of flaw | Contracts count |
|---|---|
| Bidders count not published | 0% (0 from 14) |
| Procedure type not published | 0% (0 from 14) |
| Missing buyer ID | 0% (0 from 14) |
| Missing call for tenders | 0% (0 from 14) |
| Missing winning price | 0% (0 from 14) |
| Contract modification by more than 50 % | 0% (0 from 14) |
Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements? detailed info
| Check | Result | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? | 100% (contracts) | ||||||||||||
| Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? | 0.43 (average mistakes per contract) | ||||||||||||
| Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 14 tenders under the law) |
|
| Contract | Type of flaw |
|---|---|
| Dům č. p. 48 – Stará lékárna, Sušice“ - JŘBU | Price inconsistent with Journal |
| Dům č. p. 48 – Stará lékárna, Sušice“ - JŘBU | Payment information missing |
| Sportovní hala Sušice | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| Lesopark Pod Kalichem v Sušici - vegetační úpravy | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
| SUŠICE - VOLŠOVY - ZÁSOBOVÁNÍ PITNOU VODOU III. ETAPA | Bidders insonsistent with Journal count |
| Lesopark Pod Kalichem v Sušici - stavební část | Bid evaluation protocol missing |
Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally? detailed info
Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.
