Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Svitavy

IČO 00277444

Buyer profile has high number of errors. Purchases are made in legal regime, there is no tendency to portion contracts.

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

38%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
I/43 Hradec nad Svitavou - Lačnov
Construction, foundation and surface works for highways, roads
6
Ø6 in industry
Rozšíření objektu T. G. Masaryka 33a ve Svitavách – stavba (opakované zadání II)
Construction work
4
Ø4 in industry
Komunitní dům seniorů, T. G. Masaryka 11/31, Svitavy
Construction work
2
Ø4 in industry
Obnova objektu MěÚ T. G. Masaryka 5/35 Svitavy - obnova fasády a obnova terasy A, B (opakované zadání)
Construction work for art and cultural buildings
5
Ø3 in industry
Technická a dopravní infrastruktura Habrová, Svitavy
Road construction works
16
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
M-SILNICE a.s.
2 394,268,990
EUROVIA CS, a.s.
1 393,467,984
HIKELE stavební firma s.r.o.
4 44,639,652
IMOS Brno, a.s.
1 41,375,622
SYNER, s.r.o.
1 41,375,622
Other suppliers 42 1,004,158,138

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

18%
average 27%
Tool Contracts count
Extended deadlines 12% (1 from 8)
Nonprice competition 6% (1 from 18)
Division into lots 0% (0 from 18)
E-auction 0% (0 from 18)
Innovative procedure 0% (0 from 18)

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

83%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 796,079,174
Small scale tenders 93,933,610
Unregulated purchases 406,166,273
Total 1,296,179,057

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

93%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rozšíření objektu T. G. Masaryka 33a ve Svitavách – stavba (opakované zadání II)
Contract modification
82,751,244 12,181,277 (+15%)
Obnova objektu MěÚ T. G. Masaryka 5/35 Svitavy - obnova fasády a obnova terasy A, B (opakované zadání)
Contract modification
20,769,525 5,835,040 (+29%)
Rekonstrukce a modernizace stravovacího zařízení Základní školy Felberova ve Svitavách – stavební práce
Contract modification
17,164,975 1,358,402 (+8%)
DODÁVKA TEPLA K VYTÁPĚNÍ A OHŘEVU TEPLÉ VODY PRO OBJEKTY MĚSTA SVITAVY
Technical exclusivity
- Not disclosed

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

62%
average 60%

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

100%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 21)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 21)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 21)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 21)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 21)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 21)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

11%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 15% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.10 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 20 tenders under the law)
0-250K 1 tender
250K-500K 3 tenders
500K-1000K 7 tenders
1000K+ 17 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.