Small cities • 2020 • past ranking

Město Fulnek

IČO 00297861

The competition for contracts is high. Buyer profile has high number of errors.

49.
ranking
72%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

89%
average 47%

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

93%
average 82%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
Pražská plynárenská, a.s.
4 32,963,972
BYSTROŇ Group a.s.
1 26,466,951
CENTROPOL ENERGY, a.s.
3 22,223,809
ENWOX ENERGY s.r.o.
2 19,577,402
Energie ČS, a.s.
2 19,577,402
Other suppliers 24 104,434,652

Pro-competitive tools

Does the buyer foster the competition by using the available tools?   detailed info 

40%
average 32%

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

63%
average 58%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 120,546,415
Small scale tenders 3,140,405
Unregulated purchases 189,992,708
Total 313,679,528

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

87%
average 89%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Mateřská škola Fulnek
Not disclosed
- 3,220,000
Energetické úspory objektu ZŠ T. G. Masaryka Fulnek
Contract modification
13,982,808 2,573,931 (+19%)
Stavební úprava a rekonstrukce bytového domu Fučíkova č.p. 4 ve Fulneku
Contract modification
6,344,474 965,065 (+16%)
Úprava autobusových zálivových zastávek, zřízení přechodů pro chodce a chodníků v lokalitě Fulnek - Pohořilky
Contract modification
7,146,288 689,630 (+10%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

64%
average 64%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

96%
average 96%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 19)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 19)
Missing buyer ID 11% (2 from 19)
Missing call for tenders 5% (1 from 19)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 19)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 19)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

17%
average 43%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 47% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.74 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 19 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 3 tenders
1000K+ 0 tenders