Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Staré Město

IČO 00567884

Good buyer. Buyer profile is in relatively good shape. The competition for contracts is high.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Snížení energetické náročnosti ZŠ Staré Město 1000
Construction work for buildings relating to education and research
Ø4 in industry
Snížení energetické náročnosti DPS č.p. 2015, ulice bratří Mrštíků, Staré Město
Restoration work
Ø3 in industry
Místní komunikace Nová čtvrť a Finská čtvrť
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Výstavby infrastruktury pro RD Velehradská-demolice objektů
Construction work
Ø4 in industry
Založení prvků ÚSES v lokalitě V Rybnících, k.ú. Staré Město
Planting and maintenance services of green areas
Ø2 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
STAMOS Uherské Hradiště, spol. s r.o.
1 28,746,328
Vodohospodářské stavby Javorník-CZ s.r.o.
3 16,519,616
SMO a.s.
1 11,877,771
KODRLA s.r.o.
3 11,282,553 s.r.o.
2 10,870,000
Other suppliers 50 127,633,102

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 191,019,799
Small scale tenders 60,842,537
Unregulated purchases 184,384,532
Total 436,246,867

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Snížení energetické náročnosti DPS č.p. 2015, ulice bratří Mrštíků, Staré Město
Contract modification
17,700,690 1,242,015 (+8%)
Revitalizace ulice Tyršova, Staré Město
Contract modification
5,745,000 843,520 (+15%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 0% (0 from 17)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 17)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.06 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 17 tenders under the law)
0-250K 4 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 19 tenders
1000K+ 15 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.