Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Lovosice

IČO 00263991

Calls for tenders are often modified or cancelled. Data on buyer profile have relatively good quality.

105.
ranking
71%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

40%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce a změna dispozic ubytovny v Lovosicích
Structures construction work
6
Ø4 in industry
Úvěr na modernizaci ubytovny zimního stadionu
Buyer profile data - no industry specification
2
Ø2 in industry
Pojištění majetku a odpovědnosti za škodu města Lovosice
Property insurance services
3
Ø2 in industry
Podzemní kontejnery města Lovosice
Construction work
1
Ø4 in industry
Zajištění veřejné městské hromadné dopravní obslužnosti ve městě Lovosice v režimu veřejné linkové dopravy
Public road transport services
3
Ø3 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

99%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
GKR STAVBY s.r.o.
1 89,816,879
Hasičská vzájemná pojišťovna, a.s.
2 32,709,888
Československá obchodní banka, a. s.
1 31,638,166
LT-BAU s.r.o.
4 12,730,668
EP ENERGY TRADING, a.s.
1 10,019,616
Other suppliers 60 253,306,379

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

74%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 113,913,581
Small scale tenders 120,117,355
Unregulated purchases 196,433,541
Total 430,464,476

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Rekonstrukce a změna dispozic ubytovny v Lovosicích
Contract modification
89,816,879 852,843 (+1%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

40%
average 60%
Type of flaw Result
Issued tenders without published result 0%
Cancelled contracts 20%
Average requirements modifications count 2.00
Average decision length 57.60 days

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

94%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 15)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 15)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 15)
Missing call for tenders 13% (2 from 15)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 15)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 15)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

68%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 87% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 1.27 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 15 tenders under the law)
0-250K 15 tenders
250K-500K 6 tenders
500K-1000K 13 tenders
1000K+ 19 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.