Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Moravská Třebová

IČO 00277037

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.

39.
ranking
75%
zIndex

Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

47%
average 51%
Largest contracts
Industry
Bids
Rekonstrukce kanalizace a komunikace v ul. Svitavská, Moravská Třebová
Construction work for highways, roads
4
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace ul. Lanškrounská Moravská Třebová
Sewer construction work
2
Ø5 in industry
Na hranici na hraně - Bike resort Moravská Třebová, stavební práce - Singletracky Moravská Třebová
Cycle path construction work
2
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce odborných učeben - ZŠ Kostelní a ZŠ Palackého, Moravská Třebová
Construction work for school buildings
2
Ø3 in industry
Stezka pro chodce a cyklisty - Moravská Třebová - Útěchov - II. a III. etapa
Road construction works
3
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

95%
average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EVT Stavby s.r.o.
1 20,306,826
KAVE Bau s.r.o.
1 16,116,201
JS Moravská Třebová s.r.o.
2 14,114,742
Slovenské elektrárne Česká republika, s.r.o.
1 8,192,430
BO CO, spol. s r.o.
1 8,099,220
Other suppliers 24 102,746,371

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

73%
average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 228,088,412
Small scale tenders 13,321,169
Unregulated purchases 215,890,889
Total 457,300,470

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

98%
average 87%
Contract
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Na hranici na hraně - Bike resort Moravská Třebová, stavební práce
Contract modification
9,477,516 502,787 (+6%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

60%
average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

98%
average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 17)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 17)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

51%
average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.44 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 5 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

80%
average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.