Small cities • 2022 • past ranking

Město Moravská Třebová

IČO 00277037

Good buyer. Buyer divides contracts into lots to foster participation of SME's There are not many contract extensions and ammendments.


Zindex je pro nás rozcvička.

Najít rizika ve veřejných zakázkách →

Bidder participation

Is the level of competition satisfactory?   detailed info 

average 51%
Largest contracts
Rekonstrukce kanalizace a komunikace v ul. Svitavská, Moravská Třebová
Construction work for highways, roads
Ø5 in industry
Kanalizace ul. Lanškrounská Moravská Třebová
Sewer construction work
Ø5 in industry
Na hranici na hraně - Bike resort Moravská Třebová, stavební práce - Singletracky Moravská Třebová
Cycle path construction work
Ø5 in industry
Rekonstrukce odborných učeben - ZŠ Kostelní a ZŠ Palackého, Moravská Třebová
Construction work for school buildings
Ø3 in industry
Stezka pro chodce a cyklisty - Moravská Třebová - Útěchov - II. a III. etapa
Road construction works
Ø6 in industry

Winner concentration

Isn't majority of contracts awarded to small circle of firms?   detailed info 

average 86%
Largest suppliers Contracts count Contracts volume Kč
EVT Stavby s.r.o.
1 20,306,826
KAVE Bau s.r.o.
1 16,116,201
JS Moravská Třebová s.r.o.
2 14,114,742
Slovenské elektrárne Česká republika, s.r.o.
1 8,192,430
BO CO, spol. s r.o.
1 8,099,220
Other suppliers 24 102,746,371

Public procurement share on total purchases

What fraction of purchases was made under procurement law?   detailed info 

average 68%
Purchases Volume (Kč)
Public procurement 228,088,412
Small scale tenders 13,321,169
Unregulated purchases 215,890,889
Total 457,300,470

Competitive contracting

How often does buyer use non-competitive procedures?   detailed info 

average 87%
Reason for negotiated procedure without publication
Original contract (Kč) Contract modification / NPWP (Kč)
Na hranici na hraně - Bike resort Moravská Třebová, stavební práce
Contract modification
9,477,516 502,787 (+6%)

Consistent conduct

Does buyer discourage bidders by frequent competition cancellations or modifications?   detailed info 

average 60%
Average values displayed

Journal data quality

Does buyer publish vital data in official journal?   detailed info 

average 98%
Type of flaw Contracts count
Bidders count not published 0% (0 from 17)
Procedure type not published 0% (0 from 17)
Missing buyer ID 0% (0 from 17)
Missing call for tenders 6% (1 from 17)
Missing winning price 0% (0 from 17)
Contract modification by more than 50 % 0% (0 from 17)

Buyer profile data quality

Does the buyer profile fulfill the legal requirements?   detailed info 

average 49%
Check Result
Is the buyers website consistent with central procurement registry? 100% (contracts)
Are there obvious flaws or inconsistencies within the data? 0.44 (average mistakes per contract)
Are small scale tenders published on a buyer profile? (Compared to quantity of 16 tenders under the law)
0-250K 0 tenders
250K-500K 1 tender
500K-1000K 2 tenders
1000K+ 5 tenders

Supplier feedback

Have the tenders according to companies been procured fairly and professionally?   detailed info 

average 81%

Buyer did not get enough feedback (yet) to get a statistically relevant rating from his tender participants. Thus he gets standard rank of 80 %.